BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

33 results for “capital gains”+ Section 46Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi311Mumbai274Chennai93Ahmedabad73Kolkata66Hyderabad64Jaipur64Bangalore46Pune36Chandigarh34Indore33Guwahati24Surat20Visakhapatnam15Panaji13Cuttack12Lucknow10Raipur10Rajkot9Nagpur7Amritsar6Allahabad5Agra4Patna4Cochin3Jodhpur3Jabalpur2Dehradun1SC1Telangana1Karnataka1Calcutta1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)34Addition to Income21Section 143(2)13Section 153A12Section 54B9Section 689Section 54E7Section 271(1)(c)6Penalty6Unexplained Investment

THE ITO-2(2), INDORE vs. SMT. MOHAN BAI POKHRANA, INDORE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 468/IND/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 May 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri O.P.Meena, Am आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A. No.468/Ind/2013 "नधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Year: 2009-10

Section 54BSection 54ESection 54F

capital gain of Rs. 73.08 lacs which out of this Rs. 15.49 lacs is claimed deduction u/s. 54F and Rs. 50 lacs u/s. 54EC and Rs. 4,35,467/- u/s. 54B however, the claim u/s. 54B was made during the course of assessment proceedings the AO has disallowed the claim under section 54B of the Act on the said agricultural

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3(1), INDORE vs. SHRI RAJEEV AJMERA, INDORE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Showing 1–20 of 33 · Page 1 of 2

5
Section 1324
Deduction4
ITA 51/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: Disposed
ITAT Indore
31 Aug 2022
AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms.Suchitra Kamble & Shrib.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2010-11 Dcit-3(1) Shri Rajeev Ajmera, Indore बनाम/ Indore Vs. (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Pan: Abgpa4930L Co No.23/Ind/2018 (Arising Out Of Ita No.51/Ind/2018) Assessment Year: 2010-11 Shri Rajeev Ajmera, Dcit-3(1) Indore Indore बनाम/ Vs. (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Pan: Abgpa4930L Assessee By Shri Mahendra Mittal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 23.08.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 31.08.2022 आदेश/ O R D E R

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 44A

gain against the sale of flat of Rs. 68,79,170/- by stating that the appeal is allowed for statistical purpose merely on affidavit filed by the assessee and ignoring the fact that the residential flat was held by the assessee as capital asset as per purchase deed & assessee is in real estate consultancy business. 3. Whether on the facts

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-2, INDORE vs. SHRI MOHANLAL CHUGH, INDORE

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue for the A

ITA 239/IND/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad(Virtual Hearing)

capital gain from sale of units in ‘The View’ project and business income from sale of units in ‘Almas 12 Mohanlal Chugh & others Elements’ project in his original returns of income furnished u/s 139 of the Act. We further find that during the course of the assessment proceedings, the assessee had duly furnished all the necessary details, documents, bills, vouchers

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-2, INDORE vs. M/S. CHUGH REALTY, INDORE

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue for the A

ITA 238/IND/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad(Virtual Hearing)

capital gain from sale of units in ‘The View’ project and business income from sale of units in ‘Almas 12 Mohanlal Chugh & others Elements’ project in his original returns of income furnished u/s 139 of the Act. We further find that during the course of the assessment proceedings, the assessee had duly furnished all the necessary details, documents, bills, vouchers

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-2, INDORE vs. SHRI NITESH CHUGH, INDORE

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue for the A

ITA 122/IND/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Borad(Virtual Hearing)

capital gain from sale of units in ‘The View’ project and business income from sale of units in ‘Almas 12 Mohanlal Chugh & others Elements’ project in his original returns of income furnished u/s 139 of the Act. We further find that during the course of the assessment proceedings, the assessee had duly furnished all the necessary details, documents, bills, vouchers

THE ACIT, 5(1), INDORE vs. SHRI RAJ KUMAR SHAMBHUDAYAL AGRAWAL, INDORE

In the result, Appeal of the Revenue in ITANo

ITA 148/IND/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Nov 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav Hon'Ble & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year:2011-12 Acit 5(1) Shri Raj Kumar Indore Shambhudayal Agrawal बनाम/ Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Respondent ) P.A. No.Adcpa0468M Revenue By Shri Rajeeb Jain, Cit-Dr Respondent By S/Shri C.P. Rawka & Veenus Rawka, Cas Date Of Hearing: 13.10.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.11.2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manish Borad: The Above Captioned Appeal At The Instance Of Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-Iii, (In Short ‘Cit(A)’), Indore Dated 25.11.2016 Which Is Arising Out Of The Order U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961(In Short The ‘Act’) Dated 27.02.2014 Framed By Dcit-5(1) Indore.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144

capital gain. 6.Whether Ld. CIT (Appeals) has erred in deleting addition of Rs. 18 lacs made on account of cash deposits in bank account. 7.The appellant craves leave to add to or deduct from or otherwise amend the above rounds of appeal. 5. Ld. DR vehemently argued supporting the order of Assessing Officer along with furnishing remand report dated

ITO3(1) , INDORE vs. M/S PARAMETRIC TRADING P LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 543/IND/2018[11-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 Feb 2023

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Advocate
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as to ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2011- 12. 2. The Revenue has questioned the admission of additional evidence under Rule 46A of IT Rules by the Ld. CIT(A). ITA No. 543/Ind/2018 [ITO vs. M/s. Parametric Trading Pvt. Ltd.] Asst.Year.– 2011-12 - 2 - 3. On this aspect

INCOME TAX OFFICER - 3(1), BHOPAL, METRO WALK BUILDING, BITTON MARKET, BHOPAL vs. SHABANA SHEIKH, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical

ITA 588/IND/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Oct 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Paresh M Joshiassessment Year: 2018-19

Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 246ASection 250Section 253Section 54ESection 69A

Section 253 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for sake of brevity) before this Tribunal. The Revenue is aggrieved by order bearing Number ITBA/NFAC/250/2024-25/1065398935(1) dated 05.06.2024 passed by Ld. CIT(A), u/s 250 of the Act which is hereinafter referred to as the “impugned order”. The relevant Page 1 of 8 Shabana Sheikh

JCIT(OSD),-2(1),INDORE, INDORE vs. SHRI KESHAV KUMAR NACHANI, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 441/IND/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Deshpande, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

gain under section 10(38) of the Act can be made in the absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search. These submissions and case laws referred to by the assessee are reproduced by the ld.CIT(A) in his impugned order. The ld.CIT(A) after considering detailed submissions of the assessee and case laws cited

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI KESHAV KUMAR NACHANI, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 309/IND/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Deshpande, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

gain under section 10(38) of the Act can be made in the absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search. These submissions and case laws referred to by the assessee are reproduced by the ld.CIT(A) in his impugned order. The ld.CIT(A) after considering detailed submissions of the assessee and case laws cited

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI KESHAV KUMAR NACHANI, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 244/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Deshpande, CAFor Respondent: Shri P.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

gain under section 10(38) of the Act can be made in the absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search. These submissions and case laws referred to by the assessee are reproduced by the ld.CIT(A) in his impugned order. The ld.CIT(A) after considering detailed submissions of the assessee and case laws cited

INDORE PARASPAR SAHAKARI GRAH NIRMAN SANSTHA SAMITI,INDORE vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1), INDORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 322/IND/2023[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore18 Jun 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanim/S. Indore Paraspar Sahkari Acit, Circle 2(1) Grih Nirman Sanstha Indore Vs. 224-Mishal Plaza, Tilakpath, Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aaaai2629G Assessee By Ms. Shreya Jain, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 06.06.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 18.06.2024 O R D E R

Section 50CSection 69

gain of Rs.12,07,193/- was worked out by the AO. 3.1 The Next contention of the Ld. Counsel is that since it is a leasehold property and the transfer was under the supervision of the competent authority in the Cooperative Society Department of Government of MP and therefore, the consideration which was duly approved by the authorities as well

ACIT CIRCLE 1(1), UJJAIN vs. A ONE ENCLAVE, UJJAIN

In the result, grounds taken by Revenue are dismissed

ITA 828/IND/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 Jul 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2012-13 Acit, Circle-1(1), V/S M/S. A One Enclave, Ujjain 3687/1, Hariphatak Road, Ujjain

Section 115BSection 133ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

46a (or set off of any loss) assessee under any provision of shall be allowed to the assessee this Act in computing his income under any provision of this Act in referred to in clause (a) f sub- computing his income referred to in section (1). clause (a) of sub-section (1). The sub-section (2) provides that notwithstanding anything

DCIT 1(1), INDORE vs. M/S MAA UMIYA AGRITECH PVT. LTD. , INDORE

In the result, appeal of Revenue is dismissed

ITA 89/IND/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore08 Jun 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanidcit 1(1) M/S. Maa Umiya Agritech Pvt. Ltd. Indore 119, A.B. Road, Aloo Pyaj Mandi, Vs. Indore (Appellant / (Revenue) (Assessee) Pan: Aabcn8230F Revenue By Shri P.K. Mishra, Cit-Dr Respondent By Shri S.S. Solanki, Ar Date Of Hearing 11.04.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 08.06.2023

Section 12ASection 138Section 144Section 145

capital gain 45,00,000/- (as discussed in para 8) Total assess Income 5,38,80,006/- 11. The AO rejected the claim of loss only on the ground that nobody has responded to the notice issued however, the return of income as well as audit report was very much available with the AO as recorded in the assessment order

SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH THAKUR,INDORE vs. THE ACIT 3(1), INDORE

In the result, all these cross appeals i

ITA 28/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore08 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Acit, 3(1) 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ M.P. Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan:Agops3983Q Assessment Year: 2012-13 Dcit-3(1) Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Indore 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ Vs. M.P. (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan:Agops3983Q Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Acit, 3(1) 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ M.P. Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan:Agops3983Q

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 54B

capital gain is arising at Rs.6,17,445/-. The assessee made a claim of exemption u/s 54B of the Act at Rs.6,17,445/- but no evidence placed in support thereof before both the lower authorities. Even during the course of hearing before the Tribunal assessee has not made any submissions with 8 Virendra Singh Thakur ITANos.28 & others/Ind/2017 regard

THE DCIT-3(1), INDORE vs. SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH THAKUR, INDORE

In the result, all these cross appeals i

ITA 52/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore08 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Acit, 3(1) 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ M.P. Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan:Agops3983Q Assessment Year: 2012-13 Dcit-3(1) Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Indore 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ Vs. M.P. (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan:Agops3983Q Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Acit, 3(1) 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ M.P. Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan:Agops3983Q

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 54B

capital gain is arising at Rs.6,17,445/-. The assessee made a claim of exemption u/s 54B of the Act at Rs.6,17,445/- but no evidence placed in support thereof before both the lower authorities. Even during the course of hearing before the Tribunal assessee has not made any submissions with 8 Virendra Singh Thakur ITANos.28 & others/Ind/2017 regard

SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH THAKUR,INDORE vs. THE ACIT 3(1), INDORE

In the result, all these cross appeals i

ITA 29/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore08 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Acit, 3(1) 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ M.P. Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan:Agops3983Q Assessment Year: 2012-13 Dcit-3(1) Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Indore 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ Vs. M.P. (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan:Agops3983Q Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Acit, 3(1) 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ M.P. Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan:Agops3983Q

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 54B

capital gain is arising at Rs.6,17,445/-. The assessee made a claim of exemption u/s 54B of the Act at Rs.6,17,445/- but no evidence placed in support thereof before both the lower authorities. Even during the course of hearing before the Tribunal assessee has not made any submissions with 8 Virendra Singh Thakur ITANos.28 & others/Ind/2017 regard

THE DCIT-3(1), INDORE vs. SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH THAKUR, INDORE

In the result, all these cross appeals i

ITA 253/IND/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore08 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Acit, 3(1) 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ M.P. Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan:Agops3983Q Assessment Year: 2012-13 Dcit-3(1) Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Indore 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ Vs. M.P. (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan:Agops3983Q Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Acit, 3(1) 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ M.P. Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan:Agops3983Q

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 54B

capital gain is arising at Rs.6,17,445/-. The assessee made a claim of exemption u/s 54B of the Act at Rs.6,17,445/- but no evidence placed in support thereof before both the lower authorities. Even during the course of hearing before the Tribunal assessee has not made any submissions with 8 Virendra Singh Thakur ITANos.28 & others/Ind/2017 regard

SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH THAKUR,INDORE vs. THE ACIT 3(1), INDORE

In the result, all these cross appeals i

ITA 262/IND/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore08 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Acit, 3(1) 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ M.P. Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan:Agops3983Q Assessment Year: 2012-13 Dcit-3(1) Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Indore 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ Vs. M.P. (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan:Agops3983Q Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Acit, 3(1) 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ M.P. Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan:Agops3983Q

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 54B

capital gain is arising at Rs.6,17,445/-. The assessee made a claim of exemption u/s 54B of the Act at Rs.6,17,445/- but no evidence placed in support thereof before both the lower authorities. Even during the course of hearing before the Tribunal assessee has not made any submissions with 8 Virendra Singh Thakur ITANos.28 & others/Ind/2017 regard

THE DCIT-3(1), INDORE vs. SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH THAKUR, INDORE

In the result, all these cross appeals i

ITA 53/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore08 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Acit, 3(1) 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ M.P. Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan:Agops3983Q Assessment Year: 2012-13 Dcit-3(1) Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Indore 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ Vs. M.P. (Revenue) (Respondent) Pan:Agops3983Q Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Virendra Singh Thakur Acit, 3(1) 125/126, Patnipura, Indore बनाम/ M.P. Indore Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan:Agops3983Q

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 54B

capital gain is arising at Rs.6,17,445/-. The assessee made a claim of exemption u/s 54B of the Act at Rs.6,17,445/- but no evidence placed in support thereof before both the lower authorities. Even during the course of hearing before the Tribunal assessee has not made any submissions with 8 Virendra Singh Thakur ITANos.28 & others/Ind/2017 regard