BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 271Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai11Jaipur7Ahmedabad6Rajkot4Delhi4SC3Bangalore3Indore3Chennai2Chandigarh2Kolkata1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 271B6Section 271A3Penalty3Section 44A2Section 1442Cash Deposit2

SHRI ASHOK KUMAR JATAV,BHOPAL vs. ITO-5(4), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 592/IND/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Shri Ashok Kumar Jatav Ito 5(4), Bhopal Bhopal Vs. (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Abwpj 3945 J Assessee By None Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Dr Date Of Hearing 18.08.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 23.08.2022 O R D E R Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 271ASection 271BSection 44A

capital gain or adventure / business, has always been a matter of dispute and litigation and there cannot be a short-cut or standard formula to decide exact nature, particularly by means of a short-finding in the penalty-order even while maintaining total silence in the assessment-order. In any case, considering the fact that there can be two views

AMIT ASHOK AGRAWAL,INDORE vs. ITO-2(2), INDORE

In the result, the quantum appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes and penalty appeal of assesse is allowed

ITA 209/IND/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Oct 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 144Section 271A

section 68 of the income tax act. 6.4. The appellant has now submitted that it has received business income and transfers from other banks of self. However, the appellant was not able to prove the same on the basis of cashbook and details of cash sales, etc. The remand report also states that the claim made by the appellant cannot

AMIT ASHOK AGRAWAL,INDORE vs. ITO-2(2), INDORE

In the result, the quantum appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes and penalty appeal of assesse is allowed

ITA 210/IND/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Oct 2023AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 144Section 271A

section 68 of the income tax act. 6.4. The appellant has now submitted that it has received business income and transfers from other banks of self. However, the appellant was not able to prove the same on the basis of cashbook and details of cash sales, etc. The remand report also states that the claim made by the appellant cannot