BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 270A(9)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi159Mumbai148Chandigarh71Jaipur57Ahmedabad42Bangalore28Hyderabad27Chennai25Pune22Kolkata10Nagpur9Agra7Rajkot5Lucknow4Raipur4Surat3Ranchi2Amritsar2Indore2Visakhapatnam1Jodhpur1Dehradun1Cuttack1Cochin1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 54B8Section 117Section 45(3)5Section 12A4Section 102Exemption2Addition to Income2

SMT HAFIZ SHAIKH,DEWAS vs. THE ITO WARD-1, DEWAS

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 56/IND/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 May 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanihafiz Shaikh Ito Ward-1 32/2, Laxmi Park Moti Dewas Vs. Bunglow Dewas (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Ajups6986 L Assessee By Ms. Richa Parwal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 25.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 29.05.2023

Section 45Section 45(3)Section 54Section 54B

270A is being initiated separately. 6. The provision of section 45(3) contemplates only the deemed consideration in case of transfer of capital asset by the partner to the partnership firm. Therefore, the claim of deduction u/s 54B cannot be denied only because the transfer of the capital asset falls under the provision of section

SHREE SHANTANU VIDHYAPEETH SOCIETY ,INDORE, M.P. vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC, DELHI, DELHI

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 640/IND/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore24 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi**

Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(3)

9. The Supreme Court in the case of Inder Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh reported in 2025 INSC 382 has held as under:* *"There can be no quarrel on the settled principle of law that delay cannot be condoned without sufficient cause, but a major aspect which has to be kept in mind is that, if in a particular