BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 200Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai67Kolkata17Bangalore17Delhi13Surat11Mumbai10Ahmedabad5Rajkot4Indore3Jodhpur2Pune2Jaipur2SC1Hyderabad1

Key Topics

Section 1110Section 2(15)6Section 292B3Section 11(1)(a)2Section 220(2)2Section 12A2Section 2632Business Income2Exemption2Deduction

SHRI VIKRAM SINGH PUAR SON & LR OF LATE TUKOJI ROA PUAR,DEWAS vs. THE PR. CIT-1, BHOPAL

The appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 407/IND/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 May 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2011-12 Vikram Singh Paur, Pr. Cit Son & Legal Heir Of Late Shri Bhopal बनाम/ Tukoji Rao Puar Vs. Dewas (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.Agdpp8186B Appellant By Shri Girish Agrawal, Ca Revenue By Shri S.B. Prasad, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 27.01.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 20 .05.2020 आदेश / O R D E R Per Kul Bharat, J.M: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against Order Of Pr. Cit, Bhopal Dated 18.03.2016 For The Assessment Year

Section 263Section 292B

capital gain and amount of gifts. 5. The income tax proceeding for the assessment years under reference being carried simultaneously before AO-Dewas and AP-Bhopal since 2012. 6. The required information were filed earlier which is clear on the latter dated 25.09.2012 as per annexure-E. 2. Ground no.1 to 3 are against the legality of the order

M/S MADHYA PRADESH MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee i

2
TDS2
Disallowance2
ITA 280/IND/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore03 Jan 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 220(2)

capital expenses to be able to sustain and continue in long run. The petitioner ITA 280 of 2014 and ITA 692 of 2013 17 MP Madhyam has to be substantially self-sustaining in long-term and should not depend upon government, in other words taxpayers should not subsidize the said activities, which nevertheless are charitable and fall under the residuary

M/S MADHYA PRADESH MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT, BHOPAL

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee i

ITA 692/IND/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore03 Jan 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 220(2)

capital expenses to be able to sustain and continue in long run. The petitioner ITA 280 of 2014 and ITA 692 of 2013 17 MP Madhyam has to be substantially self-sustaining in long-term and should not depend upon government, in other words taxpayers should not subsidize the said activities, which nevertheless are charitable and fall under the residuary