SHRI VINOD CHOUDHARY,INDORE vs. ITO1 3), INDORE
The appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 206/IND/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2023AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanishri Vinod Choudhary, Ito 1(3) 12, Niranjanpur, Indore Vs. Lasudia, Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Akrpv 4892 Q Assessee By Shri Pankaj Shah & Soumya Bomb, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 27.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 28.02.2023
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 2(47)Section 2(47)(v)Section 54F
1,07,93,900/- was made resulting into a tax demand of Rs. 39,86,910/-.
The Ld. A.R. submitted that the Assessing Officer erred in determining the Long Term Capital Gain from sale of urban agricultural land in A.Y. 2012-13
without appreciating the fact that the Long Term Capital Gain had accrued to the assessee