Search: bogus purchases

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 270A(9)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai37 Jaipur35 Rajkot18 Guwahati16 Ahmedabad12 Delhi9 Surat8 Nagpur7 Hyderabad6 Indore3 Chennai3 Pune3 Lucknow2 Chandigarh2 Jodhpur1 Patna1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 40A(2)(b)5 Section 143(3)3 Section 270A3 Section 40A(2)3 Penalty3 Addition to Income3 Section 143(2)2 Bogus Purchases2 Disallowance2

HAMID HUSAIN,BHOPAL vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 115/IND/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiito-4(1), Hamid Husain, बनाम/ Bhopal 369, Kaji Camp, Vs. Gali No.3, Near Sindhi Colony, Berasia Road, Bhopal (Revenue/Appellant) (Assessee/Respondent) Hamid Husain, Assessment Unit, बनाम/ 369, Kaji Camp, Income Tax Department Vs. Gali No.3, Near Sindhi Colony, Berasia Road, Bhopal (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent)

Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 270A

9,10,39,185/- shown as bogus purchases is hereby added to the income of the assessee and penalty proceedings under section 270A

SHIVALAYA ENGINEERING WORKS,MANDIDEEP vs. ITO, BHOPAL

In the result we are of the considered opinion

HAMID HUSAIN,BHOPAL vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

SHIVALAYA ENGINEERING WORKS,MANDIDEEP vs. ITO, BHOPAL

HAMID HUSAIN,BHOPAL vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

SHIVALAYA ENGINEERING WORKS,MANDIDEEP vs. ITO, BHOPAL

KHANDWA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,INDORE vs. ACIT, KHANDWA, KHANDWA