Search: bogus purchases

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 270A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai38 Jaipur35 Rajkot18 Ahmedabad16 Guwahati16 Surat9 Delhi9 Nagpur7 Hyderabad6 Pune5 Indore3 Chennai3 Chandigarh2 Lucknow2 Kolkata1 Patna1 Jodhpur1 Bangalore1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 40A(2)(b)5 Section 143(3)3 Section 270A3 Section 40A(2)3 Penalty3 Addition to Income3 Section 143(2)2 Bogus Purchases2 Disallowance2

HAMID HUSAIN,BHOPAL vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 115/IND/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Indore14 Oct 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiito-4(1), Hamid Husain, बनाम/ Bhopal 369, Kaji Camp, Vs. Gali No.3, Near Sindhi Colony, Berasia Road, Bhopal (Revenue/Appellant) (Assessee/Respondent) Hamid Husain, Assessment Unit, बनाम/ 369, Kaji Camp, Income Tax Department Vs. Gali No.3, Near Sindhi Colony, Berasia Road, Bhopal (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent)

Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 270A

section 270A of the I.T. Act are also being initiated separately for under reporting of the income. (Addition of Rs. 9,10,39,185/-)” (ii) Aggrieved, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal before CIT(A). The assessee made detailed submission which is re-produced by CIT(A) in Para No. 4 / Pages 3 to 6 of impugned order

HAMID HUSAIN,BHOPAL vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

SHIVALAYA ENGINEERING WORKS,MANDIDEEP vs. ITO, BHOPAL

HAMID HUSAIN,BHOPAL vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, DELHI

SHIVALAYA ENGINEERING WORKS,MANDIDEEP vs. ITO, BHOPAL

KHANDWA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,INDORE vs. ACIT, KHANDWA, KHANDWA