THE DCIT, 1(1), BHOPAL vs. SMT. SUDESH CHAWLA, BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

164 to 169/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 to 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07 Smt. Sarita Chawla ACIT 1(2), Bhopal Bhopal Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue ) PAN ADGPC8831N Appellant by Shri Ashish Goyal & N.D. Patwa, ARs Respondent by Smt. Ashima Gupta, CIT-DR Date of Hearing: 21.09.2020 Date of Pronouncement: 26.11.2020 आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH

LATE SMT. SUDESH CHAWLA L/H SHRI PREM CHAWLA,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

164 to 169/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 to 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07 Smt. Sarita Chawla ACIT 1(2), Bhopal Bhopal Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue ) PAN ADGPC8831N Appellant by Shri Ashish Goyal & N.D. Patwa, ARs Respondent by Smt. Ashima Gupta, CIT-DR Date of Hearing: 21.09.2020 Date of Pronouncement: 26.11.2020 आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH

SMT. SARITA CHAWLA,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assessee for Assessment Years

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradit(Ss)A Nos. 158 To 163/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 To 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07

164 to 169/Ind/2015 Assessment Years 2000-01 to 2005-06 & Assessment Year-2006-07 Smt. Sarita Chawla ACIT 1(2), Bhopal Bhopal Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue ) PAN ADGPC8831N Appellant by Shri Ashish Goyal & N.D. Patwa, ARs Respondent by Smt. Ashima Gupta, CIT-DR Date of Hearing: 21.09.2020 Date of Pronouncement: 26.11.2020 आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH

THE ACIT, CENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. M/S SURYA INFRA VENTURE PVT. LTD., INDORE

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

bogus blasting expenses. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings found that assessee has claimed blasting expenses of Rs. 13,39,555/- , however, has submitted details of Rs. 1,01,330/- only which has also been reproduced by the AO on page no 3 of the impunged assessment order. The AO further observed that payments were made

THE ACIT, CIRCLE 2(1), INDORE vs. M/S SURYA INFRA VENTURE PVT. LTD., INDORE

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

bogus blasting expenses. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings found that assessee has claimed blasting expenses of Rs. 13,39,555/- , however, has submitted details of Rs. 1,01,330/- only which has also been reproduced by the AO on page no 3 of the impunged assessment order. The AO further observed that payments were made

THE AIT,ENTRAL-1, INDORE vs. SURYA INFRAVENTURE P LTD, INDORE

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

bogus blasting expenses. The AO during the course of assessment proceedings found that assessee has claimed blasting expenses of Rs. 13,39,555/- , however, has submitted details of Rs. 1,01,330/- only which has also been reproduced by the AO on page no 3 of the impunged assessment order. The AO further observed that payments were made