BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 148Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai146Delhi61Jaipur44Kolkata38Rajkot32Chandigarh23Hyderabad18Ahmedabad16Raipur14Surat13Visakhapatnam9Chennai9Guwahati8Agra6Pune5Jabalpur2Indore2Bangalore2Dehradun1Cuttack1Jodhpur1Amritsar1Lucknow1Nagpur1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 1489Section 1474Section 69C2Addition to Income2

NILIMA KOTHARI,INDORE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSTT. CENTRE, INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed as per terms indicated above

ITA 259/IND/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Sept 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manish Boradsmt. Neelima Kothari, Income Tax Officer, 601, N.R.K. Villas, Delhi Vs. 22/2 Manoramaganj, Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Adnpk7832J Assessee By Shri S.S. Deshpande, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 08.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.09.2024

Section 10(38)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 68

bogus solely on the basis of information provided by Investigation Wing, Mumbai. Sale proceeds were verifiable independently from the record of the company as well from the stock exchange. The appellant had purchased shares of an existing company and after holding the same for longer time part of it were sold. The burden casted upon the appellant was proved

PRIME CONSTRUCTIONS,BHOPAL vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, BHOPAL

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 742/IND/2024[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Aug 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshiassessment Year: 2018-19

Section 147Section 148Section 246ASection 250Section 253Section 271ASection 69C

section 69C, penalty proceedings u/s 271AAC are separately initiated. 2.2 That the assessee being aggrieved by the “Impugned Assessment Order” prefers first appeal u/s 246A of the Act, Page 2 of 7 Prime Construction A.Y. 2018-19 before the Ld. CIT(A) who by the “Impugned order” has partly allowed, the first appeal of the assessee on the grounds & reasons