BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

429 results for “TDS”+ Section 88clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,337Mumbai1,205Bangalore575Chennai461Indore429Kolkata288Hyderabad269Ahmedabad247Pune189Jaipur155Chandigarh143Karnataka124Visakhapatnam123Cochin118Raipur112Cuttack95Ranchi67Surat57Amritsar40Guwahati36Agra33Rajkot33Lucknow32Jodhpur26Nagpur26Allahabad21Patna19Kerala18Telangana13Dehradun13SC7Jabalpur5Calcutta3Panaji2Gauhati1Varanasi1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 200A168Section 234E153TDS96Section 20068Section 688Addition to Income8Section 206C7Section 115Section 69C4Section 271D

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 917/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

88 ITR 192(SC). The relevant findings of the Tribunal are as under:- 11. "We have heard the rival contentions and perused the record. The issue arising in the present bunch of appeals is against levy of late filing fees under section 234E of the Act while issuing intimation under section 200A of the Act, in the first bunch

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 914/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 429 · Page 1 of 22

...
4
Deduction4
Condonation of Delay3
ITAT Indore
13 Oct 2025
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

88 ITR 192(SC). The relevant findings of the Tribunal are as under:- 11. "We have heard the rival contentions and perused the record. The issue arising in the present bunch of appeals is against levy of late filing fees under section 234E of the Act while issuing intimation under section 200A of the Act, in the first bunch

PATWA ABHIKARAN P LTD,INDORE vs. ACIT- TDS-CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, this appeal is party allowed

ITA 59/IND/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

88,390/- respectively. Therefore, according to assessee, the TDS actually deducted was in fact more than the TDS deductible and hence there was no short-deduction. It is also observed that the controversy of short- deduction between the revenue and assessee is for the reason that the revenue has computed deductible amount of TDS on “gross salary”, whereas the assessee

PATWA ABHIKARAN P LTD,INDORE vs. ACIT- TDS-CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, this appeal is party allowed

ITA 58/IND/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

88,390/- respectively. Therefore, according to assessee, the TDS actually deducted was in fact more than the TDS deductible and hence there was no short-deduction. It is also observed that the controversy of short- deduction between the revenue and assessee is for the reason that the revenue has computed deductible amount of TDS on “gross salary”, whereas the assessee

PATWA ABHIKARAN P LTD,INDORE vs. ACIT- TDS-CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, this appeal is party allowed

ITA 60/IND/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

88,390/- respectively. Therefore, according to assessee, the TDS actually deducted was in fact more than the TDS deductible and hence there was no short-deduction. It is also observed that the controversy of short- deduction between the revenue and assessee is for the reason that the revenue has computed deductible amount of TDS on “gross salary”, whereas the assessee

M/S. ANDRITZ HYDRO PRIVATE LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS VA TECH HYDRO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED),BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT 1(1), BHOPAL

In the result, grounds taken by the assessee in all the years with respect to provision of warranty are allowed

ITA 157/IND/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

Section 143(3)Section 144C

section 9(1)(vi) and section 9(1)(vii)of the Act as well as under India- Austria Tax Treaty on which TDS was not made hence, the AO has rightly disallowed the same under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 6.5. We have heard the rival submissions of both the parties and have perused the material available

THE DCIT, 1(1), BHOPAL vs. M/S. ANDRITZ HYDRO PVT. LTD., RAISEN

In the result, grounds taken by the assessee in all the years with respect to provision of warranty are allowed

ITA 265/IND/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

Section 143(3)Section 144C

section 9(1)(vi) and section 9(1)(vii)of the Act as well as under India- Austria Tax Treaty on which TDS was not made hence, the AO has rightly disallowed the same under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 6.5. We have heard the rival submissions of both the parties and have perused the material available

THE ACIT, 1(1), BHOPAL vs. M/S. ANDRITZ HYDRO PVT. LTD., RAISEN

In the result, grounds taken by the assessee in all the years with respect to provision of warranty are allowed

ITA 349/IND/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

Section 143(3)Section 144C

section 9(1)(vi) and section 9(1)(vii)of the Act as well as under India- Austria Tax Treaty on which TDS was not made hence, the AO has rightly disallowed the same under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 6.5. We have heard the rival submissions of both the parties and have perused the material available

M/S ANDRITZ HYDRO PRIVATE LIMITED (EARLIER KNOWN AS V A TECH HYDRO INDAI PVT. LTD.),MANDIDEEP vs. THE ACIT 1(1), BHOPAL

In the result, grounds taken by the assessee in all the years with respect to provision of warranty are allowed

ITA 316/IND/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Feb 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri D.T. Garasia & Shri O.P. Meena

Section 143(3)Section 144C

section 9(1)(vi) and section 9(1)(vii)of the Act as well as under India- Austria Tax Treaty on which TDS was not made hence, the AO has rightly disallowed the same under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 6.5. We have heard the rival submissions of both the parties and have perused the material available

THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA TIMRANI BRANCH,TIMRANI BRANCH vs. DCIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all 93 appeals at the instance of assessee(s) are allowed

ITA 154/IND/2018[2013-14 24Q3]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement filed for a period prior to 01.06.2015, no late fee could be levied in the intimation issued u/s 200A of the Act. 3. Heard. The ld. CIT(A), while deciding the matter against the assessee, has placed reliance on 'Rajesh Kaurani vs. UOI', 83 Taxmann.com 137 (Guj), wherein, it has been held that section 200A

THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA RASHULIYA BRANCH, RASHULIYA BRANCH vs. DCIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all 93 appeals at the instance of assessee(s) are allowed

ITA 143/IND/2018[13-14 24q2]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement filed for a period prior to 01.06.2015, no late fee could be levied in the intimation issued u/s 200A of the Act. 3. Heard. The ld. CIT(A), while deciding the matter against the assessee, has placed reliance on 'Rajesh Kaurani vs. UOI', 83 Taxmann.com 137 (Guj), wherein, it has been held that section 200A

THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA RAISEN BRANCH,RAISEN BRANCH vs. DCIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all 93 appeals at the instance of assessee(s) are allowed

ITA 142/IND/2018[13-1426q2]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement filed for a period prior to 01.06.2015, no late fee could be levied in the intimation issued u/s 200A of the Act. 3. Heard. The ld. CIT(A), while deciding the matter against the assessee, has placed reliance on 'Rajesh Kaurani vs. UOI', 83 Taxmann.com 137 (Guj), wherein, it has been held that section 200A

THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA SANCHI BRANCH, SANCHI BRANCH vs. DCIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all 93 appeals at the instance of assessee(s) are allowed

ITA 149/IND/2018[14-15-24Q1]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement filed for a period prior to 01.06.2015, no late fee could be levied in the intimation issued u/s 200A of the Act. 3. Heard. The ld. CIT(A), while deciding the matter against the assessee, has placed reliance on 'Rajesh Kaurani vs. UOI', 83 Taxmann.com 137 (Guj), wherein, it has been held that section 200A

THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA,TIMRANI vs. DCIT CIT TDS, BHOPAL

In the result, all 93 appeals at the instance of assessee(s) are allowed

ITA 153/IND/2018[13-14 26 Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement filed for a period prior to 01.06.2015, no late fee could be levied in the intimation issued u/s 200A of the Act. 3. Heard. The ld. CIT(A), while deciding the matter against the assessee, has placed reliance on 'Rajesh Kaurani vs. UOI', 83 Taxmann.com 137 (Guj), wherein, it has been held that section 200A

THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA SANCHI BRANCH, SANCHI BRANCH vs. DCIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all 93 appeals at the instance of assessee(s) are allowed

ITA 148/IND/2018[13-14-24q2]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement filed for a period prior to 01.06.2015, no late fee could be levied in the intimation issued u/s 200A of the Act. 3. Heard. The ld. CIT(A), while deciding the matter against the assessee, has placed reliance on 'Rajesh Kaurani vs. UOI', 83 Taxmann.com 137 (Guj), wherein, it has been held that section 200A

THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA SEHORE BRANCH,TIMARANI vs. DCIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all 93 appeals at the instance of assessee(s) are allowed

ITA 155/IND/2018[13-14 (26 Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement filed for a period prior to 01.06.2015, no late fee could be levied in the intimation issued u/s 200A of the Act. 3. Heard. The ld. CIT(A), while deciding the matter against the assessee, has placed reliance on 'Rajesh Kaurani vs. UOI', 83 Taxmann.com 137 (Guj), wherein, it has been held that section 200A

THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA MUGALIA HAT BRANCH,MUGALIA HAT BRANCH vs. DCIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all 93 appeals at the instance of assessee(s) are allowed

ITA 138/IND/2018[14-15(24 Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement filed for a period prior to 01.06.2015, no late fee could be levied in the intimation issued u/s 200A of the Act. 3. Heard. The ld. CIT(A), while deciding the matter against the assessee, has placed reliance on 'Rajesh Kaurani vs. UOI', 83 Taxmann.com 137 (Guj), wherein, it has been held that section 200A

THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA,INDORE vs. DCIT CPC TDS, BHOPAL

In the result, all 93 appeals at the instance of assessee(s) are allowed

ITA 129/IND/2018[14-15 24 Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement filed for a period prior to 01.06.2015, no late fee could be levied in the intimation issued u/s 200A of the Act. 3. Heard. The ld. CIT(A), while deciding the matter against the assessee, has placed reliance on 'Rajesh Kaurani vs. UOI', 83 Taxmann.com 137 (Guj), wherein, it has been held that section 200A

THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA,INDORE vs. DCIT CPC TDS, BHOPAL

In the result, all 93 appeals at the instance of assessee(s) are allowed

ITA 137/IND/2018[13-14 24 Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement filed for a period prior to 01.06.2015, no late fee could be levied in the intimation issued u/s 200A of the Act. 3. Heard. The ld. CIT(A), while deciding the matter against the assessee, has placed reliance on 'Rajesh Kaurani vs. UOI', 83 Taxmann.com 137 (Guj), wherein, it has been held that section 200A

THE CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA MUGALIA HAT BRANCH,MUGALIA HAT BRANCH vs. DCIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all 93 appeals at the instance of assessee(s) are allowed

ITA 139/IND/2018[14-15,24q2]Status: DisposedITAT Indore22 Jan 2019

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 234E

TDS statement filed for a period prior to 01.06.2015, no late fee could be levied in the intimation issued u/s 200A of the Act. 3. Heard. The ld. CIT(A), while deciding the matter against the assessee, has placed reliance on 'Rajesh Kaurani vs. UOI', 83 Taxmann.com 137 (Guj), wherein, it has been held that section 200A