Search: TDS | BharatTax

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 50C(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai85 Delhi49 Bangalore17 Jaipur11 Chennai11 Ahmedabad9 Guwahati9 Kolkata8 Lucknow5 Surat4 Pune3 Nagpur3 Agra3 Visakhapatnam2 Indore2 Jabalpur1 Patna1 Hyderabad1 Raipur1 Dehradun1 Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 2634 Section 14A2 Section 542 Deduction2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3(1), INDORE vs. SHRI RAJEEV AJMERA, INDORE

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 51/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms.Suchitra Kamble & Shrib.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2010-11 Dcit-3(1) Shri Rajeev Ajmera, Indore बनाम/ Indore Vs. (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Pan: Abgpa4930L Co No.23/Ind/2018 (Arising Out Of Ita No.51/Ind/2018) Assessment Year: 2010-11 Shri Rajeev Ajmera, Dcit-3(1) Indore Indore बनाम/ Vs. (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Pan: Abgpa4930L Assessee By Shri Mahendra Mittal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 23.08.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 31.08.2022 आदेश/ O R D E R

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 44A

TDS and subsequent has filed their return of income. Amounts could not be disallowed. (3) ITO vs. Nam Estates (P) Ltd. (2013) 141 ITD 659 Bang, 21 ITR (Trib) 109 Bang Expenses on commission and brokerage charges on which tax deducted at source and remitted to the treasury were genuine and allowed the same. (4) CIT vs. Gopaldas Estate Housing

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3(1), INDORE vs. SHRI RAJEEV AJMERA, INDORE

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3(1), INDORE vs. SHRI RAJEEV AJMERA, INDORE

SHRI SHALIGRAM BAROD, ,INDORE vs. PR. CIT-1, INDORE