BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “TDS”+ Section 285clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai186Delhi159Hyderabad97Karnataka84Bangalore83Chennai57Kolkata36Visakhapatnam27Pune26Ahmedabad22Jaipur22Indore12Cuttack10Raipur9Surat9Chandigarh9Guwahati8Lucknow6Allahabad4Jabalpur4Rajkot2Amritsar2Panaji2Agra1SC1Cochin1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 234E35Section 200A30Section 143(3)18Section 14712Section 6812Section 26310TDS8Section 144A6Addition to Income6Section 200

MAAN ALUMINIUM LTD.,PITHAMPUR vs. ITO (IT & TP), BHOPAL

ITA 6/IND/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2015-16 Maan Aluminium Ltd. Ito (It & Tp), 427, Orbit Mall, Bhopal बनाम/ 4Th Floor, Ab Road, Vs. Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent / Revenue) Pan: Aapcm 0088 C / Tan: Bplm 07361 E Assessee By Shri Sudhir Padliya, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 06.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 31.03.2023

Section 195Section 201(1)Section 9Section 90(4)

TDS): Sr. Name of the supplier Total Amount Name of the Indian Agent No. Remitted in through which transaction Rs. done 1 Cupral Global Trading FZE, 3,99,100 Australia 2 Cupral Global Trading FZE, 16,74,223 Mr. Suresh Menon, proprietor UAE of M/s Damodar Sons 3 Cupral International Pty Ltd, 2,78,78,285 Agency, Cochin Australia

M/S. OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT PROSECUTION OFFICER,DEWAS vs. ACIT (CPCD) GAHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

5
Penalty5
Search & Seizure4

In the result, the ground of appeal is partly allowed

ITA 260/IND/2019[2014-15-24Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Mar 2020

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)(C)Section 206CSection 234E

285,286/Ind/2019 District Prosecution Officer आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH: The above captioned bunch of 5 appeals are at the instance of respective assessees and are directed against the respective orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), (in short ‘CIT(A)’). As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together

M/S. OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT PROSECUTION OFFICER,DEWAS vs. ACIT (CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS), DEWAS

In the result, the ground of appeal is partly allowed

ITA 262/IND/2019[2015-16-24Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Mar 2020

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)(C)Section 206CSection 234E

285,286/Ind/2019 District Prosecution Officer आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH: The above captioned bunch of 5 appeals are at the instance of respective assessees and are directed against the respective orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), (in short ‘CIT(A)’). As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together

DISTRICT PUBLICPROSECUTION OFFICER,UJJAIN vs. THE ACIT CPC-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the ground of appeal is partly allowed

ITA 286/IND/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Mar 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)(C)Section 206CSection 234E

285,286/Ind/2019 District Prosecution Officer आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH: The above captioned bunch of 5 appeals are at the instance of respective assessees and are directed against the respective orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), (in short ‘CIT(A)’). As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together

M/S. OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT PROSECUTION OFFICER,DEWAS vs. ACIT (CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CELL-TDS), DEWAS

In the result, the ground of appeal is partly allowed

ITA 261/IND/2019[2014-15-24Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Mar 2020

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)(C)Section 206CSection 234E

285,286/Ind/2019 District Prosecution Officer आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH: The above captioned bunch of 5 appeals are at the instance of respective assessees and are directed against the respective orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), (in short ‘CIT(A)’). As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together

DISTRICT PUBLICPROSECUTION OFFICER,UJJAIN vs. THE ACIT CPC-TDS,, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the ground of appeal is partly allowed

ITA 285/IND/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Mar 2020AY 2016-17

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)(C)Section 206CSection 234E

285,286/Ind/2019 District Prosecution Officer आदेश / O R D E R PER BENCH: The above captioned bunch of 5 appeals are at the instance of respective assessees and are directed against the respective orders of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), (in short ‘CIT(A)’). As the issue raised in all these appeals are similar, these were heard together

ACIT , RATLAM vs. M/S SHIRANI AUTOMOTIVES PVT. LTD, RATLAM MP

ITA 555/IND/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2014-15 Acit, M/S. Shirani Automotive Ratlam P. Ltd. बनाम/ 29, Shirani Pura, Vs. Ratlam (Appellant / Revenue) (Respondent / Assessee) Pan: Aancs 1007 M Revenue By Shri P.K. Mishra, Cit-Dr Assessee By None Date Of Hearing 02.03.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 31.03.2023

Section 143(3)Section 2(22)(e)Section 36

TDS on the amount of Rs. 2,80,800/- u/s 194IA instead of section 194C. Section 194IA is applicable for sale of immovable property for a value exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs. The appellant has not sold any immovable property to M/s Volkswagon during the year under consideration. The Appellant has offered the income of Rs. 2,80,800/- for taxation

M/S. BHANDARI HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE,INDORE vs. THE PR. CIT-1, INDORE

ITA 355/IND/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Mar 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 M/S Bhandari Hospital & Pr. Cit-(I) Research Centre, Gf-21 & Indore बनाम/ 22, Opp. Meghdoot Garden, Vs. Vijay Nagar, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.Aadfb8151A

Section 131(1)(d)Section 143(3)Section 144ASection 263Section 35A

TDS as per provisions of the Income Tax was made or not.” 7. In response thereto, the assessee filed its objections against invoking the provisions in the form of written submissions the Ld. Authorised Representative had also made oral arguments against invoking the provisions of Section 263 of the Act Ld. Pr. CIT. However, Ld. Pr. CIT was not satisfied

DCIT-1(1), BHOPAL vs. M/S GLOBUS MEGA PROJECT PVT. LTD, BHOPAL

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and C

ITA 577/IND/2018[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Indore08 Sept 2022AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri P.K. Mitra, CIT/DRFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Fadnis, A.R
Section 132Section 142ASection 143Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 40Section 69C

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) relating to the Assessment Year (A.Y) 2010-11 and assessment order passed u/s. 143 (3) of the Act relating to the Assessment Year 2011-12. The Cross Objections are filed by the assessee as against the respective Revenue appeals. Since common grounds are raised

ACIT (CENTRAL) , UJJAIN vs. M/S. ARIBA FOODS (P) LTD., INDORE

ITA 736/IND/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Jan 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Justice P.P. Bhatt, Hon'Ble & Hon'Ble Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/S. Ariba Foods Pvt. Acit (Central), Vs. Ltd, 101, Gold Star Building, Ujjain Opp. Treasure Island, 5767 M.G. Road, Indore (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aalca7223M Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. Vyanktesh Plastics Acit (Central), Vs. & Packaging Pvt. Ltd, 75/7-B, Industrial Area, Ujjain Maxi Road, Ujjain (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aaacv6547J Assessment Year: 2011-12

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68

285 Shri Amit Kedia 463 Shri Amit Kedia and Articles of to Financing to was neither a to was neither a Association 224 300 promoter nor a 476 promoter nor a director of FVPL director of NVPL as alleged by as alleged by the the AO. AO. 3 Certificate for 225 - - - - - Commencement of Business 4 Certificate for 226 Name

THE ACIT (CENTRAL), UJJAIN vs. M/S. VYANKTESH PLASTICS & PACKAGING (P) LTD., UJJAIN

ITA 737/IND/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore11 Jan 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Justice P.P. Bhatt, Hon'Ble & Hon'Ble Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/S. Ariba Foods Pvt. Acit (Central), Vs. Ltd, 101, Gold Star Building, Ujjain Opp. Treasure Island, 5767 M.G. Road, Indore (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aalca7223M Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. Vyanktesh Plastics Acit (Central), Vs. & Packaging Pvt. Ltd, 75/7-B, Industrial Area, Ujjain Maxi Road, Ujjain (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aaacv6547J Assessment Year: 2011-12

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68

285 Shri Amit Kedia 463 Shri Amit Kedia and Articles of to Financing to was neither a to was neither a Association 224 300 promoter nor a 476 promoter nor a director of FVPL director of NVPL as alleged by as alleged by the the AO. AO. 3 Certificate for 225 - - - - - Commencement of Business 4 Certificate for 226 Name

THE ACIT (CENTRAL), UJJAIN vs. M/S. FAMOUS VANIJYA (P) LTD. , UJJAIN

ITA 773/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Jan 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Justice P.P. Bhatt, Hon'Ble & Hon'Ble Manish Boradvirtual Hearing Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/S. Ariba Foods Pvt. Acit (Central), Vs. Ltd, 101, Gold Star Building, Ujjain Opp. Treasure Island, 5767 M.G. Road, Indore (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aalca7223M Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. Vyanktesh Plastics Acit (Central), Vs. & Packaging Pvt. Ltd, 75/7-B, Industrial Area, Ujjain Maxi Road, Ujjain (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aaacv6547J Assessment Year: 2011-12

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68

285 Shri Amit Kedia 463 Shri Amit Kedia and Articles of to Financing to was neither a to was neither a Association 224 300 promoter nor a 476 promoter nor a director of FVPL director of NVPL as alleged by as alleged by the the AO. AO. 3 Certificate for 225 - - - - - Commencement of Business 4 Certificate for 226 Name