M/S. BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED,INDORE vs. THE CIT- (TDS), BHOPAL

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

TDS but we are informed that this process was put in cold storage while the airlines and the revenue were contesting the primary issue of the applicability of Section 194H before various appellate forums. Section 271C

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED,INDORE vs. JCIT TDS, INDORE

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

TDS but we are informed that this process was put in cold storage while the airlines and the revenue were contesting the primary issue of the applicability of Section 194H before various appellate forums. Section 271C

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. JCIT TDS INDORE, INDORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesse is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniidea Cellular Ltd. Jcit 139-140 Electronics Complex Indore Vs. Pardeshipura Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Aaacb 2100P Assessee By Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Adv. & Gagan Tiwari, Adv. Revenue By Ms. Simran Bhullar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 20.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 22.09.2023

TDS but we are informed that this process was put in cold storage while the airlines and the revenue were contesting the primary issue of the applicability of Section 194H before various appellate forums. Section 271C

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. JCIT TDS INDORE, INDORE

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani&

TDS but we are informed that this process was put in cold storage while the airlines and the revenue were contesting the primary issue of the applicability of Section 194H before various appellate forums. Section 271C

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. JCIT TDS INDORE, INDORE

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani&

TDS but we are informed that this process was put in cold storage while the airlines and the revenue were contesting the primary issue of the applicability of Section 194H before various appellate forums. Section 271C

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. JCIT TDS INDORE, INDORE

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani&

TDS but we are informed that this process was put in cold storage while the airlines and the revenue were contesting the primary issue of the applicability of Section 194H before various appellate forums. Section 271C

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. JCIT TDS INDORE, INDORE

In the result, appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani&

TDS but we are informed that this process was put in cold storage while the airlines and the revenue were contesting the primary issue of the applicability of Section 194H before various appellate forums. Section 271C

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. JCIT TDS INDORE, INDORE

In the result common ground no

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

section 271C of the Act on the alleged ground that Appellant has failed to deduct TDS under section 194H of the Act in respect

IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED,INDORE vs. JCIT TDS INDORE, INDORE

In the result common ground no

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

section 271C of the Act on the alleged ground that Appellant has failed to deduct TDS under section 194H of the Act in respect

PERMALI WALLACE PVT. LTD,BHOPAL vs. ITO (IT & TP), BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

TDS and having not deducted, there was a failure on the part of assessee. Accordingly, the AO treated the assessee as defaulter in terms of section 201(1)/(1A) of the act;created demand of tax and interest and also proposed for initiation for penalty u/s 271C

PERMALI WALLACE PVT. LTD,BHOPAL vs. ITO (IT & TP), BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

TDS and having not deducted, there was a failure on the part of assessee. Accordingly, the AO treated the assessee as defaulter in terms of section 201(1)/(1A) of the act;created demand of tax and interest and also proposed for initiation for penalty u/s 271C

PERMALI WALLACE PVT. LTD,BHOPAL vs. ITO (IT & TP), BHOPAL

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

TDS and having not deducted, there was a failure on the part of assessee. Accordingly, the AO treated the assessee as defaulter in terms of section 201(1)/(1A) of the act;created demand of tax and interest and also proposed for initiation for penalty u/s 271C

BHARAT SHARMA,INDORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTL.TAXATION), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2015-16

Section 271C by not appreciating the bonafide and reasonable cause for the deduction of tax at source under different provision. 2. The appellant prays that the said penalty be deleted. Shri Jitendra Sharma & Ors ITA Nos. 500 to 502/Ind/2018 Ground-IV The appellant craves lead to add, to amen, to alter and/or to delete all or any of the above

SHATRUGHAN SHARMA,INDORE vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTL.TAXATION), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2015-16

Section 271C by not appreciating the bonafide and reasonable cause for the deduction of tax at source under different provision. 2. The appellant prays that the said penalty be deleted. Shri Jitendra Sharma & Ors ITA Nos. 500 to 502/Ind/2018 Ground-IV The appellant craves lead to add, to amen, to alter and/or to delete all or any of the above

JITENDRA SHARMA ,INDORE vs. JCIT(INTL TAXATION) , AHMEDABAD

Bench: Hon’Ble Kul Bharat & Hon’Ble Manish Boradassessment Year 2015-16

Section 271C by not appreciating the bonafide and reasonable cause for the deduction of tax at source under different provision. 2. The appellant prays that the said penalty be deleted. Shri Jitendra Sharma & Ors ITA Nos. 500 to 502/Ind/2018 Ground-IV The appellant craves lead to add, to amen, to alter and/or to delete all or any of the above

SMT. RITU SINGH,BHOPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5 (1), BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatassessment Year: 2013-14 Smt. Ritu Singh Dcit B-110, Habibganj Alkapuri Bhopal बनाम/ Bhopal Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.Bmips8854D

section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as ‘the Act’) for deduction of tax. Ld. Counsel for the assessee reiterated the submissions as made before Ld. CIT(A). He further contended that the deductee has duly disclosed the amount in the return of income. Hence, no disallowance is [ITA No.59/Ind/2018] [Smt. Ritu Singh, Bhopal] called