BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ Section 270A(9)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi205Mumbai174Chandigarh63Bangalore55Pune36Jaipur27Hyderabad24Ahmedabad21Chennai17Kolkata13Guwahati9Nagpur9Visakhapatnam8Raipur8Lucknow8Indore5Patna4Rajkot4Jodhpur2Surat2Jabalpur2Amritsar1Cochin1Dehradun1Allahabad1SC1

Key Topics

Section 142(1)5Addition to Income5Section 143(3)4Section 40A(2)(b)4Section 37(1)4Penalty4Section 270A(9)3Section 113TDS3Section 270A

CMM KETI JV,INDORE vs. ITO 1(3), INDORE, INDORE

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 73/IND/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2017-18 Cmm Keti Jv, Income-Tax Officer, 108, Shalimar Corporate 1(3), Center, Indore. बनाम/ 8-B, South Tukoganj, Vs. Indore. (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aakfc7524K Assessee By Shri Shashank Sharma, Ca & Shri Prakash Gupta, Ca Revenue By Shri Sanjeev H. Bhagat, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 11.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.01.2025

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 270A(9)Section 271BSection 272(1)(d)Section 40A(2)Section 40A(2)(b)

270A(9), 271B and 272(1)(d). Page 2 of 10 CMM Keti JV, Indore. ITA No. 73/Ind/2024 – AY 2017-18 4. During first-appeal, the CIT(A) passed following order upholding the addition made by AO: “8. Ground no.1 is relating to addition of Rs. 1,03,58,390/- being 2% of the turnover as the income

2
Section 12A2
Deduction2

SAMARTHAN CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT,BHOPAL vs. DCIT(EXEMPTION), BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 404/IND/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Jan 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Udayan Das Guptaassessment Year:2018-19 Samarthan Centre For Dcit (Exemption) Development Support, Bhopal 36, Green Venue, बनाम/ Kolar Road Huzur, Vs. Bhopal (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aaats3998P Assessee By Shri Pradeep Ambastha & Ashish Goyal, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 20.01.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 31.01.2025

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 270A

section 270A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 8. That the appellant craves leave to add to, alter, amend, modify, substitute, delete and/or rescind all or any of the grounds of appeal on or before the final hearing, if necessity so arises.” 2. The background facts leading to present appeal are such that the assessee is a trust registered

RIDDHI SIDDHI REALTY,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 4(1), INCOME TAX INDORE

In the result the appeal of the assesse is allowed for

ITA 170/IND/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore06 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshiriddhi Siddhi Realty, Income Tax Officer बनाम/ 39 Shardhanand Marg, 4(1), Vs. Indore Indore

Section 143(3)Section 234Section 246ASection 250Section 253Section 270A

270A of the Income Tax Act are initiated for under-reporting of Income by assessee. 9. Subject to the above remarks and on the basis of data made available on records, total income is determined as under: Income as per return of income:- (-)Rs,7,23,551/- Add: (i) As discussed above Rs. 7,61,540/- Assessee Income

THE DCIT CIRCLE 5(1), BHOPAL vs. M/S L N MALVIYA INFRA PROJECTS P LTD, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the revenue is partly allowed

ITA 189/IND/2023[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Jan 2024AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanidcit, Circle 5(1) M/S. L.N. Malviya Infra Projects Bhopal Pvt. Ltd. Plot No.29, F/F Sector, Dwarka Vs. New Delhi

Section 234ASection 3(3)Section 37(1)

TDS is not allowable as business deduction and the lower authorities have rightly disallowed the same. Therefore the Ground No. 4 is hereby dismissed”. 9. Hence, the impugned order of the CIT(A) qua this issue is set aside and the order of the AO is restored. Page 9 of 17 ITANo.189/Ind/2023 L.N. Malviya Infra Projects P. Ltd. 10. Ground

ACIT-1(1), INDORE vs. KRITI NUTRIENTS LIMITED, INDORE

The appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 780/IND/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
Section 246ASection 250Section 253

section 144 need. As the assessee, a manufacturer, has failed to produce relevant records of\nits day-to-day maintenance.\nPOINT NO.07- Gross Profit Margin for Current Year and past three years\nTurnover\nGross Profit\nG.P.Margin\nAY 2021-22\n6,85,74,950.00\n32,59,80,098.00\n4.75