CMM KETI JV,INDORE vs. ITO 1(3), INDORE, INDORE

Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2017-18 Cmm Keti Jv, Income-Tax Officer, 108, Shalimar Corporate 1(3), Center, Indore. बनाम/ 8-B, South Tukoganj, Vs. Indore. (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aakfc7524K Assessee By Shri Shashank Sharma, Ca & Shri Prakash Gupta, Ca Revenue By Shri Sanjeev H. Bhagat, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 11.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 20.01.2025

TDS”. The AO issued notices u/s 143(2) followed by questionnaires/show-cause notices u/s 142(1) which remained uncompiled or partly complied by assessee. Ultimately, the AO passed assessment- order after making an addition of Rs. 1,03,58,079/- as under: “7. Addition on account of Business Income: Thus, the assessee was requested vide this office notice

ACIT-1(1), INDORE vs. KRITI NUTRIENTS LIMITED, INDORE

The appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical\npurposes

section 144 need. As the assessee, a manufacturer, has failed to produce relevant records of\nits day-to-day maintenance.\nPOINT NO.07- Gross Profit Margin for Current Year and past three years\nTurnover\nGross Profit\nG.P.Margin\nAY 2021-22\n6,85,74,950.00\n32,59,80,098.00\n4.75

RIDDHI SIDDHI REALTY,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 4(1), INCOME TAX INDORE

In the result the appeal of the assesse is allowed for

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshiriddhi Siddhi Realty, Income Tax Officer बनाम/ 39 Shardhanand Marg, 4(1), Vs. Indore Indore

270A of the Income Tax Act are initiated for under-reporting of Income by assessee. 9. Subject to the above remarks and on the basis of data made available on records, total income is determined as under: Income as per return of income:- (-)Rs,7,23,551/- Add: (i) As discussed above Rs. 7,61,540/- Assessee Income