BMG CALCUTTAWALA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,INDORE vs. AO CPC (TDS), ITO TDS(1) INDORE, INDORE

Appeals are allowed\"

2) of the Act also do not\nsurvive.'\n21. We find, the Delhi Bench of the Tribunal in the following\ndecisions also have held that no fee can be levied u/s 234E in\nterms of section 200A where the date of filing of TDS

PANCHSHEEL ORGANICS LIMITED,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. (3) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with sub-section (3) of section

SARTHAK REAL BUILT PVT LTD,INDORE vs. DCIT,CPC CELL,TDS, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. (3) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with sub-section (3) of section

PANCHSHEEL ORGANICS LIMITED,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. (3) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with sub-section (3) of section

SARTHAK REAL BUILT PVT. LTD.,INDORE vs. DCIT (CPC TDS), , GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. (3) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with sub-section (3) of section

SARTHAK REAL BUILT PVT LTD,INDORE vs. DCIT,CPC CELL,TDS, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. (3) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with sub-section (3) of section

SARTHAK REAL BUILT P LTD,INDORE vs. DCIT CPC TDS , GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. (3) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with sub-section (3) of section

SARTHAK REAL BUILT PVT LTD,INDORE vs. DCIT,CPC CELL,TDS, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. (3) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with sub-section (3) of section

SARTHAK REAL BUILT PVT LTD,INDORE vs. DCIT,CPC CELL,TDS, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. (3) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with sub-section (3) of section

SARTHAK REAL BUILT PVT LTD,INDORE vs. DCIT,CPC CELL,TDS, , GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeals of assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. (3) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with sub-section (3) of section

SHRI MUKESH JAIN,INDORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS)-CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 29 appeals at the instance of assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2014-15 (Q-1)

TDS are not delivered within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C of the Act. 4. The revenue authorities have levied the late fees for default in furnishing the statement in the processing of statement of tax deducted at source prepared u/s 200A of the Act. Against

SH. NARENDRA MODI,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-1 , INDORE

In the result, all the 29 appeals at the instance of assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2014-15 (Q-1)

TDS are not delivered within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C of the Act. 4. The revenue authorities have levied the late fees for default in furnishing the statement in the processing of statement of tax deducted at source prepared u/s 200A of the Act. Against

PENTAGON LABS LTD.,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-1, INDORE

In the result, all the 29 appeals at the instance of assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2014-15 (Q-1)

TDS are not delivered within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C of the Act. 4. The revenue authorities have levied the late fees for default in furnishing the statement in the processing of statement of tax deducted at source prepared u/s 200A of the Act. Against

PENTAGON LABS LTD.,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-1, INDORE

In the result, all the 29 appeals at the instance of assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2014-15 (Q-1)

TDS are not delivered within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C of the Act. 4. The revenue authorities have levied the late fees for default in furnishing the statement in the processing of statement of tax deducted at source prepared u/s 200A of the Act. Against

SINDH PUNJAB MERCANTILE CREDIT SAHKARITA LTD.,INDORE vs. ITO (TDS)-2, INDORE

In the result, all the 29 appeals at the instance of assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2014-15 (Q-1)

TDS are not delivered within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C of the Act. 4. The revenue authorities have levied the late fees for default in furnishing the statement in the processing of statement of tax deducted at source prepared u/s 200A of the Act. Against

M.P.RAJYA POWER LOOM BUNKAR SAHAKARI SANGH MARYADIT,BURHANPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the 29 appeals at the instance of assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2014-15 (Q-1)

TDS are not delivered within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C of the Act. 4. The revenue authorities have levied the late fees for default in furnishing the statement in the processing of statement of tax deducted at source prepared u/s 200A of the Act. Against

PENTAGON LABS LTD.,INDORE vs. IITO TDS-1, INDORE

In the result, all the 29 appeals at the instance of assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2014-15 (Q-1)

TDS are not delivered within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C of the Act. 4. The revenue authorities have levied the late fees for default in furnishing the statement in the processing of statement of tax deducted at source prepared u/s 200A of the Act. Against

SH. NARENDRA MODI,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-1 , INDORE

In the result, all the 29 appeals at the instance of assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2014-15 (Q-1)

TDS are not delivered within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C of the Act. 4. The revenue authorities have levied the late fees for default in furnishing the statement in the processing of statement of tax deducted at source prepared u/s 200A of the Act. Against