BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 234Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai279Delhi214Bangalore130Kolkata33Hyderabad29Ahmedabad29Chennai27Raipur21Chandigarh15Jaipur14Dehradun9Pune6Surat4Indore4Cochin3Cuttack3Visakhapatnam2Karnataka2Rajkot2Nagpur1Amritsar1Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 1110Section 2(15)6Section 37(1)4Section 143(2)4TDS4Deduction3Disallowance3Section 11(1)(a)2Section 220(2)2Section 12A

THE DCIT CIRCLE 5(1), BHOPAL vs. M/S L N MALVIYA INFRA PROJECTS P LTD, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of the revenue is partly allowed

ITA 189/IND/2023[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Jan 2024AY 2021-2022

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanidcit, Circle 5(1) M/S. L.N. Malviya Infra Projects Bhopal Pvt. Ltd. Plot No.29, F/F Sector, Dwarka Vs. New Delhi

Section 234ASection 3(3)Section 37(1)

234D. Accordingly interest on belated deposit of TDS or non-deposit of TDS by the assessee would not be an allowable claim of expenditure. Though the same may not fall in the ambit of explanation-1 to section

M/S. M. LODHA IMPEX,RATLAM vs. THE ITO-1, RATLAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 185/IND/2016[2000-01]Status: Disposed
2
Section 234A2
Business Income2
ITAT Indore
27 Jun 2018
AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradआ.अ.सं /.I.T.A. No. 185/Ind/2016 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2000-01 M/S.M.Lodha Impex, Vs. Income-Tax Officer, 117-118, Manak Chowk, Ward 1, Ratlam. Ratlam.

For Appellant: Shri Satiksh Solanki, DRFor Respondent: 29.05.2018
Section 119(1)(b)Section 119(2)(b)Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 234A

Section 142 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the Ld. CIT(A) has failed to interpret these provisions of law and thus the -: 3 :- M.LODHA IMPEX,RATLAM. entire proceedings are bad in law and needs to be annulled. 3. That the Ld. CIT(A)/Assessing Officer may be directed to grant the refund as claimed

M/S MADHYA PRADESH MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT 1(2), BHOPAL

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee i

ITA 280/IND/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore03 Jan 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 220(2)

section 11 of the I.T. Act. 3. That on the facts & in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned AO erred in law and not justified in their findings that the operating receipts and treating the excess of income over expenditure shown at Rs.3307877 as the business income. Such injudicious and unlawful findings, therefore, be quashed

M/S MADHYA PRADESH MADHYAM,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT, BHOPAL

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee i

ITA 692/IND/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore03 Jan 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 220(2)

section 11 of the I.T. Act. 3. That on the facts & in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned AO erred in law and not justified in their findings that the operating receipts and treating the excess of income over expenditure shown at Rs.3307877 as the business income. Such injudicious and unlawful findings, therefore, be quashed