MILLION TRADERS BHOPAL P LTD,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT,CPC,BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 206C of the Act. In light of above, the credit for TCS should Page 12 of 24 ITA No.124/Ind/2023 & ITANo.35/Ind/2023 Million Trader Bhopal Page 13 of 24 be given to the assessee which is finally and lawfully assessed to tax in respect of the corresponding income on which TCS has been collected. The fact that there are no specific

MILLION TRADERS BHOPAL P LTD,BHOPAL vs. THE ACIT,CPC,BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

section 206C of the Act. In light of above, the credit for TCS should Page 12 of 24 ITA No.124/Ind/2023 & ITANo.35/Ind/2023 Million Trader Bhopal Page 13 of 24 be given to the assessee which is finally and lawfully assessed to tax in respect of the corresponding income on which TCS has been collected. The fact that there are no specific

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

206C(3) of the Act, is inserted by F.A.2012 w.e.f. 01/07/2012 .Therefore, since both the substantive legislation (section imposing statutory liability as well as the charging section for levy of fees in case of violation of statutory liability) were in effect much earlier from the date of insertion of 200A(3) which is merely a mechanical provision providing for computation

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

206C(3) of the Act, is inserted by F.A.2012 w.e.f. 01/07/2012 .Therefore, since both the substantive legislation (section imposing statutory liability as well as the charging section for levy of fees in case of violation of statutory liability) were in effect much earlier from the date of insertion of 200A(3) which is merely a mechanical provision providing for computation

BMG CALCUTTAWALA JEWELLERS PVT. LTD.,INDORE vs. AO CPC (TDS), ITO TDS(1) INDORE, INDORE

Appeals are allowed\"

206C(3) of the Act, is inserted by F.A.2012\nw.e.f. 01/07/2012 .Therefore, since both the substantive\nlegislation (section imposing statutory liability as well as the\ncharging section for levy of fees in case of violation of statutory\nliability) were in effect much earlier from the date of insertion of\n200A(3) which is merely a mechanical provision providing for\ncomputation

JEEVANDHARA HOSPITAL (P) LTD.,INDORE vs. ACIT-CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD , INDORE

In the result, these three appeals

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing

TDS are not delivered within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C of the Act. 4. The revenue authorities have levied the late fees for default in furnishing the statement in the processing of statement of tax deducted at source prepared u/s 200A of the Act. Against

JEEVANDHARA HOSPITAL (P) LTD.,INDORE vs. ACIT-CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD , INDORE

In the result, these three appeals

Bench: Hon’Ble Manish Borad & Hon’Ble Madhumita Royvirtual Hearing

TDS are not delivered within the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C of the Act. 4. The revenue authorities have levied the late fees for default in furnishing the statement in the processing of statement of tax deducted at source prepared u/s 200A of the Act. Against

JUNEJA SIZE AND COAL WASH PVT. LTD,NIKHIL BUNGLOW, PHASE-III vs. ITO TDS-1 BHOPAL , BHOPAL

In the result appeal of the assassee is allowed for statistical

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

TDS-1, Vs. Nikhil Bunglow,Phase-III, Bhopal Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal (PAN: AACCJ6672J) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Shri Soumya Bumb, CA Revenue by Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 03.12.2025 Date of 30.12.2025 Pronouncement आदेश/ O R D E R Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M.: This is an appeal filed by the assessee Under Section

JCIT(OSD),-2(1),INDORE, INDORE vs. SHRI KESHAV KUMAR NACHANI, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Smt. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

206C(1) of the Act, which reflected malafide intention of the assessee to conceal the identity of the customers; that in the guise of bullion trading the assessee was channelizing hawala transaction by way of cash deposits and cash withdrawal; that disclosure of Rs.15 crores during the search in the various premises related to the assessee, the AO assumed that

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI KESHAV KUMAR NACHANI, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Smt. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

206C(1) of the Act, which reflected malafide intention of the assessee to conceal the identity of the customers; that in the guise of bullion trading the assessee was channelizing hawala transaction by way of cash deposits and cash withdrawal; that disclosure of Rs.15 crores during the search in the various premises related to the assessee, the AO assumed that

THE DCIT, 2(1), INDORE vs. SHRI KESHAV KUMAR NACHANI, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Smt. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

206C(1) of the Act, which reflected malafide intention of the assessee to conceal the identity of the customers; that in the guise of bullion trading the assessee was channelizing hawala transaction by way of cash deposits and cash withdrawal; that disclosure of Rs.15 crores during the search in the various premises related to the assessee, the AO assumed that