BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

1 result for “TDS”+ Section 2(24)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai155Chandigarh54Chennai45Bangalore40Hyderabad28Delhi27Kolkata16Cuttack12Amritsar7Jaipur6Ahmedabad5Visakhapatnam4Pune3Nagpur2Surat2Panaji1Lucknow1Indore1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 372Section 562

MADHYA PRADESH COUNSALTANCY ORGANISATION LIMITED,BHOPAL vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2(1), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 461/IND/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2013-14 M/S M.P. Consultancy Acit-2(1) बनाम/ Organization Ltd., Bhopal Vs. Block -2, 3Rd Floor Paryawas Bhawan, Arera Hills Bhopal (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aabcm0090J Appellant By Shri M.K. Sharma, Ca Revenue By Smt. Vineeta Dube, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 21.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 13 .09.2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manish Borad, A.M: This Appeal At The Instance Of Assessee Pertaining To A.Y. 2013-14 Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-I, Bhopal, (In Short ‘Cit(A)’), Dated 30.03.2017 Which Is Arising Out Of The Order U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961(Hereinafter Called As The ‘Act’) Framed On 23.-2.2016 By Acit- 2(1), Bhopal.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 224Section 271(1)(c)Section 36Section 37Section 56

viia) as per Rs.13,04,862/- para 3.6 Add: Income from Punjab National Bank not Rs.18,35,393/- offered to tax as per para 4.5 Assessed Total Income (Rounded off) Rs.1,17,71,160/- 3. Aggrieved assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) but failed to succeed. 4. Now the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal raising