BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 194Iclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi200Mumbai189Kolkata91Bangalore36Ahmedabad29Jaipur22Raipur18Chennai13Pune12Visakhapatnam9Cochin9Cuttack8Hyderabad8Jabalpur7Karnataka4Chandigarh4Varanasi3Surat3Jodhpur2Nagpur2Indore2Telangana2Guwahati1Kerala1Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 2014Section 143(3)3Section 403Section 1942Section 2632Section 194C2Deduction2TDS2

M/S. M. P. WARE HOUSING & LOGISTICS CORPORATION,INDORE vs. CIT (TDS), INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 491/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 May 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2011-12 M.P. Warehousing & Acit (Tds) Logistics Corporation, Vs. Indore Lrt Parisar, Aerodrum Road, Bada Ganapati, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Aadcm7742B Appellant By Shri Rajesh Mehta, Ca Revenue By Shri K.G. Goyal, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 12.03.2020 Date Of Pronouncement 26.05.2020

Section 133ASection 194Section 194ISection 201Section 201(1)

TDS on rent paid to co-owners (M/s Sadhna Enterprises) and the applicability of the provisions of section 194I of the Act. 8. We observe

SHRI ANIL KHANDELWAL,INDORE vs. THE ITO-5(3), INDORE

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 299/IND/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore12 Oct 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2009-10

Section 143(3)Section 194(3)Section 194CSection 194C(3)Section 263Section 40

TDS. 2. The Learned CIT Appeals-II and the AO has failed to appreciate and or over looked. (i) That the payments made to the transporters are not in respect of a transport contract for carriage of goods. (ii) That the payment made are in respect of hire of transport” 3. Brief facts of the case limited to the issue