BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “TDS”+ Section 194A(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai371Delhi266Bangalore163Chandigarh120Nagpur106Kolkata103Chennai103Pune101Karnataka70Ahmedabad69Hyderabad69Jaipur64Cochin60Visakhapatnam48Cuttack40Raipur22Rajkot16Panaji15Jodhpur14Amritsar14Surat14Indore8Telangana8SC8Jabalpur7Dehradun7Kerala4Ranchi4Allahabad4Lucknow4Guwahati3Patna3Agra3J&K2Varanasi2

Key Topics

Section 201(1)18Section 143(3)9Section 2019Section 106Section 2505Deduction5TDS5Section 80P(2)(d)4Section 1944Section 40a

ADIM JATI SEWA SAHKARI SAMITI MYDT JOBAT,ALIRAJPUR vs. FACELESS ASSESSMENT OFFICER, ALIRAJPUR

ITA 663/IND/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiadim Jati Sewa Sahkari Samiti National Faceless बनाम/ Mydt., Assessment Centre Vs. 01, Jobat, Jobat, Delhi Alirajpur (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aaala0577E Assessee By Shri P.D. Nagar, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr

Section 143(3)Section 253(5)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

section 194A(3), it appears that it provides for exemption from deducting Tax Deducted at Source from the income on interest other than interest on securities as the cooperative societies other than cooperative banks meaning thereby that the cooperative banks are liable to deduct TDS

ITO4(4), INDORE vs. SHRI KAILASH LADDHA, INDORE

Appeal are allowed

3
Disallowance3
Depreciation2
ITA 963/IND/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore19 Oct 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Kul Bharatassessment Year: 2012-13 Ito-4(4) Shri Kailash Laddha Indore बनाम/ (Revenue) (Respondent) Vs. P.A. No.Abapl7530R Revenue By Shri R.P. Maurya, Sr. Dr Respondent By S/Shri Kanak Tibrewala & Kamal Jain Ars Date Of Hearing: 15.10.2020 Date Of Pronouncement: 19.10.2020

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 194ASection 253(2)Section 40aSection 44A

TDS on the said amount.” Siraj Ul Hasan /ITANo.872/2019 2. Briefly stated facts are that the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961(herein after referred as the Act) was made on 18.03.2015 assessing the total income at Rs.5,51,223/-. Subsequently, it was observed that the assessee had not deducted tax at source on the interest

M.P. WAREHOUSING AND LOGISTICS CORPORATION, INDORE,INDORE vs. ACIT (TDS), INDORE, INDORE

In the result, both appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 196/IND/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 10Section 119Section 139Section 194Section 201(1)Section 250

3 of 5 ITA No.195 & 196/Ind/2023 MP Warehousing and Logistics Page 4 of 5 Board or bodies, by whatever name called, referred to in section 10 of the Income Tax Act, whose income is unconditionally exempt under that section and who are also statutorily not required to file return of income as per section 139 of the Income

M.P. WAREHOUSING AND LOGISTICS CORPORATION, INDORE,INDORE vs. ACIT (TDS), INDORE, INDORE

In the result, both appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 195/IND/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 10Section 119Section 139Section 194Section 201(1)Section 250

3 of 5 ITA No.195 & 196/Ind/2023 MP Warehousing and Logistics Page 4 of 5 Board or bodies, by whatever name called, referred to in section 10 of the Income Tax Act, whose income is unconditionally exempt under that section and who are also statutorily not required to file return of income as per section 139 of the Income

URBAN ADMINISTRATION AMD DEVELOPMENT,BHOPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), BHOPAL

In the result, the impugned order is set aside as & by way of

ITA 477/IND/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 Jan 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshidirectorate Of Urban Deputy बनाम/ Administrations & Development, Commissioner Of Vs. Nagar Palika Bhawan, 6 No.Bus Income Tax-Tds, Stop, R.S.Market, Bhopal S.O. Huzur, Bhopal(M.P.) (Tan: Bpldo1618B) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Sapan Usrethe, Adv. & Ms. Apoorva Garg, Ca Revenue By Shri Anup Singh, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 21.01.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 30.01.2026 आदेश / O R D E R

Section 201Section 201(1)Section 246ASection 250Section 253

194A] short deduction was worked out at Rs. 3,42,61,000/- u/s 201(1A) and interest thereon was worked out at Rs. 3,18,61,000/- u/s 201(1A). For the payment made to “ CEPT University” the TDS was found to be deducted at 4% [194J] instead of 10%. The TDS Certificate downloaded from TRACES (Certificate No. III 5DE160H

THE ACIT 1(1), UJJAIN vs. M/S PARAG FANS & COOLING SYSTEMS LTD., DEWAS

In the result appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 562/IND/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Feb 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

3) 21 ITJ 372 (Trib. - Indore)- Employees contribution to provident Fund- Employees contribution to Provident Fund –Employees contribution to Provident Fund - Deletion of second proviso to section 43B- HELD-In view of CIT v Alom Extrusions Ltd. (2010) 14 ITJ 133(SC), deletion of second proviso is retrospective-Therefore, even if employees contribution is deposited before due date of filing

THE ACIT 1(1), UJJAIN vs. M/S PARAG FANS & COOLING SYSTEMS LTD., DEWAS

In the result appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 561/IND/2018[12-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Feb 2021

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Borad

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40

3) 21 ITJ 372 (Trib. - Indore)- Employees contribution to provident Fund- Employees contribution to Provident Fund –Employees contribution to Provident Fund - Deletion of second proviso to section 43B- HELD-In view of CIT v Alom Extrusions Ltd. (2010) 14 ITJ 133(SC), deletion of second proviso is retrospective-Therefore, even if employees contribution is deposited before due date of filing

M/S. M. P. WARE HOUSING & LOGISTICS CORPORATION,INDORE vs. CIT (TDS), INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 491/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore26 May 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2011-12 M.P. Warehousing & Acit (Tds) Logistics Corporation, Vs. Indore Lrt Parisar, Aerodrum Road, Bada Ganapati, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Aadcm7742B Appellant By Shri Rajesh Mehta, Ca Revenue By Shri K.G. Goyal, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 12.03.2020 Date Of Pronouncement 26.05.2020

Section 133ASection 194Section 194ISection 201Section 201(1)

3. Ground Nos. 1 to 6.: All these grounds of appeal have been raised against non deduction of TDS on rent paid to Krishi Upaj Mandi and M/ s Sadhna Enterprises. The amount pertaining to Krishi Upaj Mandi including interest u/s 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been worked out at Rs.83,565/ - and the amount pertaining