JAGDISH SOLANKI ,JHABUA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER JHABUA, JHABUA

Appeal is dismissed

144B of Income-tax Act, 1961 [\"the Act\"] for Assessment-Year [“AY\"] 2017-18, the assessee has filed this appeal.\n2. The background facts leading to present appeal are such that the assessee-individual did not file any return of income u/s 139 of the Act. The\nPage 1 of 23\nITA No. 169/Ind/2025 – AY 2017-18\nAO, based

DR. VINOD BHANDARI,INDORE vs. THE ACIT CIR. 2(1), INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Vinod Bhandari, Pr. Cit(1), Indore 21- Gf, Bhandari House, Talkies, Scheme No.54, Vs. Vijay Nagar, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Abnpb6240M Assessment Year: 2012-13

144B, and unless the prejudice to the interests of the revenue ITA Nos.350 & 66/Ind/2017 & ITANo.57/Ind/2019 Vinod Bhandari is shown, the jurisdiction under section 263(1) cannot be exercised by the Commissioner, even though the order is erroneous. The argument that such an order may possibly be challenged in appeal by the assessee, and for this reason it is prejudicial

SHRI VINOD BHANDARI,INDORE vs. THE PR.CIT-1, INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Vinod Bhandari, Pr. Cit(1), Indore 21- Gf, Bhandari House, Talkies, Scheme No.54, Vs. Vijay Nagar, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Abnpb6240M Assessment Year: 2012-13

144B, and unless the prejudice to the interests of the revenue ITA Nos.350 & 66/Ind/2017 & ITANo.57/Ind/2019 Vinod Bhandari is shown, the jurisdiction under section 263(1) cannot be exercised by the Commissioner, even though the order is erroneous. The argument that such an order may possibly be challenged in appeal by the assessee, and for this reason it is prejudicial

DR. VINOD BHANDARI,INDORE vs. THE DCIT CIR. 2(1), INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2012-13 Shri Vinod Bhandari, Pr. Cit(1), Indore 21- Gf, Bhandari House, Talkies, Scheme No.54, Vs. Vijay Nagar, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) Pan No.Abnpb6240M Assessment Year: 2012-13

144B, and unless the prejudice to the interests of the revenue ITA Nos.350 & 66/Ind/2017 & ITANo.57/Ind/2019 Vinod Bhandari is shown, the jurisdiction under section 263(1) cannot be exercised by the Commissioner, even though the order is erroneous. The argument that such an order may possibly be challenged in appeal by the assessee, and for this reason it is prejudicial

ACIT-1(1), INDORE vs. KRITI NUTRIENTS LIMITED, INDORE

The appeal of the Revenue is allowed for statistical\npurposes

TDS has also been made as reported in Tax Audit\nReport. There being continuous growth in the turnover year after year,\nexpenditure were incurred genuinely and they are proportionate to the\nexpenditure incurred in the earlier year as evident from the previous\nyear(s) expenses narrated in the profit and loss account itself.\nAssessment orders in earlier years were also

NARENDRA KUMAR MISHRA,BHOPAL vs. ITO-3(1), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Appeal is partly allowed for statistical purpose

144B of\nIncome-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act"] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2020-21, the\nassessee has filed this appeal.\n2. The registry has informed that the present appeal is delayed by 547\ndays and therefore time-barred. The assessee has filed an application/\naffidavit for condonation of delay; the same is scanned and re-produced for\nan immediate reference

PRAVEEN AGRAWAL ,INDORE vs. DCIT 4(1) INDORE, INDORE

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

TDS & Disallowance for such default\n(iii)\nUnsecured Loans\n2.2 That as and by way of an assessment order bearing\nNo.ITBA/AST/S/143(3)/2021-22/1035802484(1) dated 22.09.\n2021 the total income of the assessee was computed at\nRs.2,20,33,310/- u/s 143(3) r.w.s.144B of the Act, which is\nhereinafter referred to as the “impugned assessment order”.\n2.3 That the assessee being

SMT. SHARDA,HARSUD, KHANDWA vs. THE PCIT-1, INDORE, INDORE

In the result, appeals of the assesse in ITANo

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanishri Premnarayan Pcit (1) 31, Somgaon Khurd, Aaykar Bhawan Harsud, Vs. Indore Khandwa (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Cjzpp1164J Smt. Sharda Pcit (1) A/45, Naya Harsud, Aaykar Bhawan Vs. Khandwa Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Fdxps2997P Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrawal & Pankaj Mogra, Ars Revenue By Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 21.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 30.08.2024

144B on 22.03.2022 by accepting the return income. Thereafter the Pr. CIT has invoked the provisions of section 263 by show cause notice u/s 263 dated 22.01.2024 as under: “M/s/Mr/Ms Subject: Noice for Hearing in respect of Revision proceedings u/s 263 of the THE INCOME TAX ACT. 1961-Assessment Year 2014-15, In this regard, a hearing in the matter

SHRI PREMNARAYAN,HARSUD, KHANDWA vs. THE PCIT-1, INDORE, INDORE

In the result, appeals of the assesse in ITANo

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanishri Premnarayan Pcit (1) 31, Somgaon Khurd, Aaykar Bhawan Harsud, Vs. Indore Khandwa (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Cjzpp1164J Smt. Sharda Pcit (1) A/45, Naya Harsud, Aaykar Bhawan Vs. Khandwa Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Fdxps2997P Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrawal & Pankaj Mogra, Ars Revenue By Shri Ram Kumar Yadav, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing 21.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 30.08.2024

144B on 22.03.2022 by accepting the return income. Thereafter the Pr. CIT has invoked the provisions of section 263 by show cause notice u/s 263 dated 22.01.2024 as under: “M/s/Mr/Ms Subject: Noice for Hearing in respect of Revision proceedings u/s 263 of the THE INCOME TAX ACT. 1961-Assessment Year 2014-15, In this regard, a hearing in the matter

JAYA GARG,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NFAC

Appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2015-16 Ms.Jaya Garg, Income-Tax Officer, C-4-C-5, Shvkripa Colony, Nfac, बनाम/ Indore New Delhi Vs. (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Agtpg4247L Assessee By Shri Pankaj Shah & Shri Soumya Bumb, Ars Revenue By Shri K. Bala Murali Krishna, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 22.08.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 30.08.2024

144B of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2015-16, the assessee has filed this appeal on following grounds: 1. On the facts and the circumstances of the case and applicable law, the CIT(A) has erred in confirming that LAO has not applied mind and initiated proceedings u/s 147 of the Act. The notice

GLOBUS HOUSING,BHOPAL vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, NFAC, DELHI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed and the “impugned

Bench: Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

144B of the Act the total income of the assessee was computed at Rs.1,83,77,290/-. The assessee’s Return of Income as per ITR filed u/s 148 was Rs.93,04,130/-. An Addition of Rs.87,20,000/- was made on account of (1) unexplained money u/s 68 of the Act (2) on account of undisclosed income of Rs.3

SHIVKRIPA DEVCONS PRIVATE LIMITED,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER OR OTHER, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE

The appeal of the assessee is allowed and the “impugned

Bench: Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshi

Section 253 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act” for sake of brevity) before this Tribunal. The assessee is aggrieved by the order bearing Number ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- 25/1067032535(1) dated 25.07.2024 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Act which is hereinafter referred to as the Page 1 of 11 Shivkripa Devcons Private