BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

52 results for “TDS”+ Condonation of Delayclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai996Pune711Mumbai650Patna614Delhi601Bangalore491Hyderabad368Kolkata293Nagpur262Raipur212Cochin209Jaipur200Chandigarh160Ahmedabad145Visakhapatnam116Cuttack103Lucknow73Surat63Karnataka54Indore52Rajkot35Amritsar34Dehradun25Jodhpur24Kerala23Allahabad19Guwahati18Panaji16Agra15Ranchi11Jabalpur10Varanasi9SC7Telangana2Rajasthan1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 272A(2)(k)48Section 201(1)42Condonation of Delay36TDS36Section 234E30Section 143(3)27Section 200A26Section 13124Addition to Income18Deduction

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 917/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

condoned and these appeals are admitted and heard. 6. The assessee is aggrieved by the late fee imposed by AO u/s 234E for delay filing of Statements of TDS

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 914/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Showing 1–20 of 52 · Page 1 of 3

14
Limitation/Time-bar13
Penalty13

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

condoned and these appeals are admitted and heard. 6. The assessee is aggrieved by the late fee imposed by AO u/s 234E for delay filing of Statements of TDS

M/S BHOPAL DUGDH SANGH SAHAKARI MY.DAIRY PLANT, BHOPAL vs. DCIT -1 (1) ,BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 128/IND/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore28 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri B.M. Biyani

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Goyal & N.D. Patva, ARsFor Respondent: Shri Amit Soni, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)

condoned the delay and proceeded for hearing of the appeal. 3. The assessee submitted return of income declaring a total income of Rs. 5,41,76,780/-. The Ld. AO selected case for scrutiny, issued statutory A.Y. 2012-13 Page 3 of 15 notices and finally completed assessment by passing order u/s 143(3) of the Act whereby the total

PATWA ABHIKARAN P LTD,INDORE vs. ACIT- TDS-CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, this appeal is party allowed

ITA 60/IND/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

condonation of delay in filing of the appeal. The Appellant prays that the said appeal be admitted and adjudicated on merits. (2) On the facts that Salary was paid to Mr. Hemant Kumar Patwa and Mr. Jayant Kumar Patwa and TDS

PATWA ABHIKARAN P LTD,INDORE vs. ACIT- TDS-CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, this appeal is party allowed

ITA 59/IND/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

condonation of delay in filing of the appeal. The Appellant prays that the said appeal be admitted and adjudicated on merits. (2) On the facts that Salary was paid to Mr. Hemant Kumar Patwa and Mr. Jayant Kumar Patwa and TDS

PATWA ABHIKARAN P LTD,INDORE vs. ACIT- TDS-CPC , GHAZIABAD

In the result, this appeal is party allowed

ITA 58/IND/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Respondent byFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.D.R
Section 200ASection 234E

condonation of delay in filing of the appeal. The Appellant prays that the said appeal be admitted and adjudicated on merits. (2) On the facts that Salary was paid to Mr. Hemant Kumar Patwa and Mr. Jayant Kumar Patwa and TDS

M/S. M. LODHA IMPEX,RATLAM vs. THE ITO-1, RATLAM

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 185/IND/2016[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Jun 2018AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradआ.अ.सं /.I.T.A. No. 185/Ind/2016 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2000-01 M/S.M.Lodha Impex, Vs. Income-Tax Officer, 117-118, Manak Chowk, Ward 1, Ratlam. Ratlam.

For Appellant: Shri Satiksh Solanki, DRFor Respondent: 29.05.2018
Section 119(1)(b)Section 119(2)(b)Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 234A

delay caused in deciding the application by the Income tax authorities and thus notice issued u/s 143(2) beyond the time limit is illegal, bad in law and needs to be annulled. 10. The Ld. Departmental Representative relied on the orders of the lower authorities. 11. We have considered the facts, rival submissions and perused the material available on record

BALAJI PHOSPHATES LIMITED,INDORE vs. DCITACIT 1(1) INDORE, INDORE

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 209/IND/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore29 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanibalaji Phosphates Limited, Dcitacit 1(1), 305, Utsav Avenue, Indore Vs. 12/5 Ushaganj, Indore (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aadcb5654R Assessee By Shri Subhash Jain, Ars Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 25.07.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 29.07.2024 O R D E R

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 234Section 40

TDS on advertisement expenses and office rent. 4. On the other hand Ld. DR has vehemently opposed to the condonation of delay

SHREERAM CONSTRUCTIONS,BHOPAL vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS), DELHI

In the result the “Impugned order” is set aside as and by

ITA 481/IND/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore27 Feb 2026AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshishreeram Construction, Commissioner Of बनाम/ Shop No.2,New Shri Ram Income-Tax Vs. Parisar, Phase I Khajuri Kala, (Appeals) Bhopal, Bhopal (Pan:Abgfs5939P) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Govind Rinwa, Ca Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 09.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 27.02.2026 आदेश/ O R D E R

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 194CSection 2(22)Section 2(22)(e)Section 246ASection 250Section 253Section 37(1)Section 40

TDS u/s. 194C wasnot deducted Rs. 7,57,720/- iv) Disallowance of transportation charges Rs. 35,850/- v) Expenses not allowable u/s. 37(1) of the Act Rs. 13,276/- Total Disallowances Rs. 30,55,158/- In this view of the matter, the decision of the AO is upheld. Consequently, the Grounds of the appellant are dismissed. 5.9 Before parting

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

Appeal is dismissed in limine as time-barred

ITA 915/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiassessment Year: 2013-14 [Financial Year: 2012-13 / Q2-26Q) M/S. Supreme Transport Ito Tds-Ii, Company, Indore 201, Vikram Tower, बनाम/ Sneh Nagar, Vs. Indore (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aaufs5010N Assessee By Shri Subhash Chand Jain, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 08.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 13.10.2025

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

TDS – Rs. 6,000/-] was levied. Aggrieved by AO’s action, the assessee carried matter in first-appeal and claimed that prior to 01.06.2015, there was no power available to AO for charging late-fee u/s 234E. Vide order dated 08.12.2025, the CIT(A) disposed of assessee’s appeal and deleted late fee levied by AO accepting that

M/S KAIPAN PANMASALA P LTD,BHOPAL vs. THE ITO 2(3) BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 408/IND/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore08 May 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanim/S. Kaipan Panmasala P. Ito -2(3) Ltd. Bhopal 10-A Sector-D Industrial Vs. Area Govindpura Bhopal (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Aadck 3766 H Assessee By Shri S.N. Agrawal, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 08.05.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 08.05.2023

condoned delay of 59 days in filing the present appeal. The assesse has raised following grounds of appeal: 1.That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld CIT(A) erred in deciding the appeal ex-parte without giving I proper opportunity of being heard to the appellant. 2.That on the facts

DISTRICT ORGANISOR TRIBAL WELFARE BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)- 1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 543/IND/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 131Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 26A

condoned. 2.1 We have considered rival submissions and carefully perused the cause of delay explained by the assessee in the application as well as in the affidavit. The assessee explained the reasons for the delay that before the summons issued u/s 131 of the Act dated 27.09.2023 which was received by the assessee only in the month of October

DISTRICT ORGANISOR TRIBAL WELFARE BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)- 1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 545/IND/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 131Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 26A

condoned. 2.1 We have considered rival submissions and carefully perused the cause of delay explained by the assessee in the application as well as in the affidavit. The assessee explained the reasons for the delay that before the summons issued u/s 131 of the Act dated 27.09.2023 which was received by the assessee only in the month of October

DISTRICT ORGANISOR TRIBAL WELFARE BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)-1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 542/IND/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 131Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 26A

condoned. 2.1 We have considered rival submissions and carefully perused the cause of delay explained by the assessee in the application as well as in the affidavit. The assessee explained the reasons for the delay that before the summons issued u/s 131 of the Act dated 27.09.2023 which was received by the assessee only in the month of October

DISTRICT ORGANISOR TRIBAL WELFARE BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)- 1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 546/IND/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 131Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 26A

condoned. 2.1 We have considered rival submissions and carefully perused the cause of delay explained by the assessee in the application as well as in the affidavit. The assessee explained the reasons for the delay that before the summons issued u/s 131 of the Act dated 27.09.2023 which was received by the assessee only in the month of October

DISTRICT ORGANISOR TRIBAL WELFARE BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)- 1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 547/IND/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 131Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 26A

condoned. 2.1 We have considered rival submissions and carefully perused the cause of delay explained by the assessee in the application as well as in the affidavit. The assessee explained the reasons for the delay that before the summons issued u/s 131 of the Act dated 27.09.2023 which was received by the assessee only in the month of October

DISTRICT ORGANISOR TRIBAL WELFARE BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)- 1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 544/IND/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 131Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 26A

condoned. 2.1 We have considered rival submissions and carefully perused the cause of delay explained by the assessee in the application as well as in the affidavit. The assessee explained the reasons for the delay that before the summons issued u/s 131 of the Act dated 27.09.2023 which was received by the assessee only in the month of October

SHRI DILIP KUMAR JAIN S/O. SAMRATHMAL JAIN,INDORE vs. THE DCIT 1(1), INDORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is

ITA 529/IND/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore07 Jun 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradआ.अ.सं /.I.T.A. Nos. 529 & 530/Ind/2015 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12 Shri Dilip Kumar Jain, Vs. Dy. Cit, S/O Shri Samrathmal Indore. Jain, Prop. M/S. Shree Kshemkari Steel, 559, Ushanagar Extn., Indore अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent "था.ले.सं./Pan: Abjrj8096M

Section 143(3)Section 145

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 5. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the business of Trading of ferrous and non-ferrous metals. During the previous year 2009-10 relevant to assessment year 2010-11, the assessee had shown gross profit of Rs. 27,97,918/- on the gross

SHRI DILIP KUMAR JAIN S/O. SAMRATHMAL JAIN,INDORE vs. THE DCIT 1(1), INDORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is

ITA 530/IND/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore07 Jun 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradआ.अ.सं /.I.T.A. Nos. 529 & 530/Ind/2015 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12 Shri Dilip Kumar Jain, Vs. Dy. Cit, S/O Shri Samrathmal Indore. Jain, Prop. M/S. Shree Kshemkari Steel, 559, Ushanagar Extn., Indore अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent "था.ले.सं./Pan: Abjrj8096M

Section 143(3)Section 145

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 5. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the business of Trading of ferrous and non-ferrous metals. During the previous year 2009-10 relevant to assessment year 2010-11, the assessee had shown gross profit of Rs. 27,97,918/- on the gross

STUTI CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD,NAGDA vs. ITO 2(2), UJJAIN

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for

ITA 326/IND/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore17 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M Joshistuti Construction Pvt. Ito 2(2), बनाम/ Ltd, Ujjain Vs. 53 Government Colony, Birla Gram, Nagda (Pan: Aahcs3932R) (Appellant) (Revenue) Assessee By Shri Anil Kumar Jain, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 08.07.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 17.07.2025 आदेश / O R D E R

Section 144Section 246ASection 250Section 253Section 68A

condone delay is attached herewith. 8. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law and without prejudice to other grounds, the order passed by Hon. CI T(A) may please be set aside as the Hon. CIT (A)erred 8 confirming order by verifying reason of not using postal address Rs. 0 given in Form