BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

26 results for “TDS”+ Block Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi977Mumbai861Bangalore611Chennai375Kolkata264Hyderabad193Karnataka184Pune172Ahmedabad149Patna134Chandigarh99Nagpur93Jaipur77Surat59Raipur47Visakhapatnam46Lucknow33Cuttack29Indore26Dehradun23Rajkot18Guwahati17Agra15Allahabad14Cochin12Jabalpur11Telangana10Jodhpur10Amritsar7Panaji3Ranchi3J&K2Calcutta1Kerala1Gauhati1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)29Section 13124TDS16Section 194I15Section 143(3)13Section 1113Addition to Income12Deduction12Section 234E10Condonation of Delay

M/S. S.R. FERRO ALLOYS,JHABUA vs. THE PCIT, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 148/IND/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Nov 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanis.R. Ferro Alloys Pr. Cit, Central 9, Siddheswar Colony Bhopal Vs. Jhabua (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Abhfs7377Q Appellant By Shri Sumit Nema, Sr. Adv. & Gagan Tiwari, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 12.10.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 09.11.2023

Section 263

block assessment in case of M/s Nikita Multi Trade Pvt. Ltd. which was also subject matter before the Pr. CIT and the disallowance made by the AO on account of depreciation was deleted. Therefore, the assesse as well as M/s. Nikita Multi Trade Pvt. Ltd. have been assessed by the same AO and hence the identity and financial statements

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 917/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore

Showing 1–20 of 26 · Page 1 of 2

8
Section 407
Disallowance7
13 Oct 2025
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2013- Page 1 of 23 M/s. Supreme Transport Company ITA No. 914 & 917/Ind/2024 – AY 2013-14 Financial Year 2012-13 / Q2 – 24Q & Q3-24Q] 14, the assessee has filed the captioned two (2) appeals on the grounds mentioned in Form No. 36 (Appeal Memo). This is the 2nd round of litigation for the same issue. The brief

SUPREME TRANSPORT COMPANY,INDORE vs. ITO TDS-II, INDORE

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 914/IND/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshi

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 234E

Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2013- Page 1 of 23 M/s. Supreme Transport Company ITA No. 914 & 917/Ind/2024 – AY 2013-14 Financial Year 2012-13 / Q2 – 24Q & Q3-24Q] 14, the assessee has filed the captioned two (2) appeals on the grounds mentioned in Form No. 36 (Appeal Memo). This is the 2nd round of litigation for the same issue. The brief

DISTRICT ORGANISOR TRIBAL WELFARE BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)- 1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 543/IND/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 131Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 26A

Assessment Years: 2012-13 to 2017-2018) District Organiser Tribal Welfare ITO (TDS)-1 Bhopal, Bhopal B- Block, Old Secretariat

DISTRICT ORGANISOR TRIBAL WELFARE BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)- 1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 544/IND/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 131Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 26A

Assessment Years: 2012-13 to 2017-2018) District Organiser Tribal Welfare ITO (TDS)-1 Bhopal, Bhopal B- Block, Old Secretariat

DISTRICT ORGANISOR TRIBAL WELFARE BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)- 1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 545/IND/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 131Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 26A

Assessment Years: 2012-13 to 2017-2018) District Organiser Tribal Welfare ITO (TDS)-1 Bhopal, Bhopal B- Block, Old Secretariat

DISTRICT ORGANISOR TRIBAL WELFARE BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)- 1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 546/IND/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 131Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 26A

Assessment Years: 2012-13 to 2017-2018) District Organiser Tribal Welfare ITO (TDS)-1 Bhopal, Bhopal B- Block, Old Secretariat

DISTRICT ORGANISOR TRIBAL WELFARE BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)-1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 542/IND/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 131Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 26A

Assessment Years: 2012-13 to 2017-2018) District Organiser Tribal Welfare ITO (TDS)-1 Bhopal, Bhopal B- Block, Old Secretariat

DISTRICT ORGANISOR TRIBAL WELFARE BHOPAL,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)- 1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical

ITA 547/IND/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Indore23 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyani

Section 131Section 194CSection 201(1)Section 26A

Assessment Years: 2012-13 to 2017-2018) District Organiser Tribal Welfare ITO (TDS)-1 Bhopal, Bhopal B- Block, Old Secretariat

SHRI CHAMAN KUMAR GOYAL,BADWAHA vs. THE ITO (TDS)-2,INDORE, INDORE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 239/IND/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Oct 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanishri Chaman Kumar Goyal Ito (Tds)-2 Goyal Oil Mills Barwaha Indore Vs. Barwaha, M.P. (Appellant / Assessee) (Revenue) Pan: Ahvpg 2117 N Assessee By Shri Ram Gilda, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 27.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement 09.10.2023

Section 194Section 194ISection 201(1)

assesse has paid only Rs. 40,00,000/- which is less than the minimum consideration of the immovable property provided in sub-section (2) of section 194IA. Thus, what is relevant for threshold limit is the consideration actually paid or stamp duty valuation of immovable property. When the assessee has paid only Rs.40,00,000/- then the assessee

THE ACIT (CENTRAL)-1, INDORE vs. DILIP KUMAR MAHENDRA KUMAR JAIN HUF, INDORE

In the result Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 809/IND/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon'Ble Kul Bharat & Hon'Ble Manish Boradassessment Year: 2011-12 Dilip Kumar Mahendra Acit (Central)-1, Vs. Kumar Jain, 6, Near Jagdale School, Indore Janki Nagar, Indore (Revenue ) (Appellant) Pan No.Aaehd1394J Revenue By Shri Harshit Bari, Sr.Dr Appellant By Shri Mahesh Agrawal, Adv. Date Of Hearing 05.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement .02.2021 O R D E R

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 69

TDS deducted on interest. Appellant has filed copies of confirmations of M/s Agrawal Cotex, M/s Shree Annapurna Ginning Factory and M/s Shiv Shakti Trading Co. On perusal of the evidences filed by the appellant it is also observed that no amount was given in cash and also the interest paid was through cheques directly to the lender by the borrower

VIJAY KUMAR GOYAL,BARWAHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS II INDORE, INDORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 13/IND/2024[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Indore08 May 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyanivijay Kumar Goyal Ito, 48, Narmada Barwala Nfac Vs. Mp Delhi (Appellant / Assessee) (Respondent/ Revenue) Pan: Asrpg8655L Assessee By Shri Ram Gilda, Ar Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 07.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 08 .05.2024

Section 194Section 194ISection 201(1)

assesse has paid only Rs. 40,00,000/- which is less than the minimum consideration of the immovable property provided in sub-section (2) of section 194IA. Thus, what is relevant for threshold limit is the consideration actually paid or stamp duty valuation of immovable property. When the assessee has paid only Rs.40,00,000/- then the assessee

BAL BHAVAN SCHOOL,BHOPAL vs. DCIT EXEMPTION, BHOPAL

Appeal is allowed as mentioned above

ITA 321/IND/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Indore10 Jun 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri B.M. Biyaniassessment Year: 2014-15 Bal Bhavan School, Dcit (Exemption), 1, Shyamla Hills, Bhopal बनाम/ Bhopal Vs. (Assessee/Appellant) (Revenue/Respondent) Pan: Aaaab3678G Assessee By Ms. Nisha Lahoti, Ca Revenue By Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 15.05.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 10.06.2024

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(3)

TDS deducted by assessee. (vi) It is submitted that by making a payment of Rs. 14,65,992/- on account of rent, there is a hefty tax burden of more than 30% in the hands of payees whereas the assessee’s income was anyways exempt u/s 11. In such a situation, why would the assessee and the specified persons make

M/S. NUTECH CONSTRUCTION,BHOPAL vs. THE DCIT 1(1), BHOPAL

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 158/IND/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore16 Jan 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2010-11

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 40Section 43B

Block, Vs. 2(2) , Bhopal Mansarovar complex, Hoshangabad Road, Bhopal (Appellant) (Respondent ) PAN No.AACFN8643E Respondent by Shri Rajeev Jain, Sr.DR Appellant by Shri Sumit Nema, Adv & Shri Amit Jain,CA (AR) Date of Hearing: 02.01.2018 Date of Pronouncement: …. 01.2018 ORDER PER MANISH BORAD, AM. This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income

MADHYA PRADESH COUNSALTANCY ORGANISATION LIMITED,BHOPAL vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2(1), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 461/IND/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Sept 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2013-14 M/S M.P. Consultancy Acit-2(1) बनाम/ Organization Ltd., Bhopal Vs. Block -2, 3Rd Floor Paryawas Bhawan, Arera Hills Bhopal (Appellant) (Revenue) Pan: Aabcm0090J Appellant By Shri M.K. Sharma, Ca Revenue By Smt. Vineeta Dube, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 21.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 13 .09.2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manish Borad, A.M: This Appeal At The Instance Of Assessee Pertaining To A.Y. 2013-14 Is Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)-I, Bhopal, (In Short ‘Cit(A)’), Dated 30.03.2017 Which Is Arising Out Of The Order U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961(Hereinafter Called As The ‘Act’) Framed On 23.-2.2016 By Acit- 2(1), Bhopal.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 224Section 271(1)(c)Section 36Section 37Section 56

Block -2, 3rd Floor Paryawas Bhawan, Arera Hills Bhopal (Appellant) (Revenue) PAN: AABCM0090J Appellant by Shri M.K. Sharma, CA Revenue by Smt. Vineeta Dube, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 21.08.2019 Date of Pronouncement: 13 .09.2019 आदेश / O R D E R PER MANISH BORAD, A.M: This appeal at the instance of Assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2013-14 is directed against

BULK PACK EXPORTS LTD,INDORE vs. ITO (IT & TP), BHOPAL

ITA 707/IND/2018[15-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Oct 2020

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 20Section 206ASection 9Section 90

block, 5th Floor, Bhopal बनाम/ Corporate House, R.N.T. Vs. Marg, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.AABCB5569R Appellant by S/Shri Anil Kamal Garg & Arpit Gaur, ARs Revenue by Smt. Vineeta Dube, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 05.10.2020 Date of Pronouncement: 20.10.2020 आदेश / O R D E R PER KUL BHARAT, J.M: These two appeals by the assessee pertaining to Assessment years

BULK PACK EXPORTS LTD,INDORE vs. ITO (IT & TP), BHOPAL

ITA 708/IND/2018[16-17]Status: DisposedITAT Indore20 Oct 2020

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Borad

Section 20Section 206ASection 9Section 90

block, 5th Floor, Bhopal बनाम/ Corporate House, R.N.T. Vs. Marg, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.AABCB5569R Appellant by S/Shri Anil Kamal Garg & Arpit Gaur, ARs Revenue by Smt. Vineeta Dube, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 05.10.2020 Date of Pronouncement: 20.10.2020 आदेश / O R D E R PER KUL BHARAT, J.M: These two appeals by the assessee pertaining to Assessment years

SHRI SURINDER SINGH BHATIA,INDORE vs. THE JCIT- 3, INDORE

Appeals are allowed/statistically allowed in terms indicated above

ITA 129/IND/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2010-11 &

Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

blocked in business assets like fixed assets and working capital in the form of cash, bank, stock, sundry debtors. He submitted that the CIT(A) has, therefore, rightly concluded that borrowed funds have been used for giving loans to sister concerns/family members. 20. We have considered rival submissions of both sides and perused the orders of lower authorities. After

SHRI SURINDER SINGH BHATIA,INDORE vs. THE JCIT RANGE-3, INDORE

Appeals are allowed/statistically allowed in terms indicated above

ITA 774/IND/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 Mar 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Ms. Suchitra Kamble & Shri B.M. Biyani(Conducted Through Virtual Court) Assessment Year: 2010-11 &

Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

blocked in business assets like fixed assets and working capital in the form of cash, bank, stock, sundry debtors. He submitted that the CIT(A) has, therefore, rightly concluded that borrowed funds have been used for giving loans to sister concerns/family members. 20. We have considered rival submissions of both sides and perused the orders of lower authorities. After

RAJ KUMAR PALIA,BHOPAL vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - ITARSI, CAMP AT BHOPAL, BHOPAL

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 453/IND/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Indore03 Feb 2026AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri B.M. Biyani & Shri Paresh M. Joshiassessment Year:2009-10 Raj Kumar Paliya Dcit/Acit M/S. Da Construction

Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 40

TDS. Ld. Counsel of the assessee also submitted that no amount was payable as on 31st March, 2009. Therefore, provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) are not applicable in the light of the decision in the case of Dy. CIT vs. Veera Associates, 55 taxmann.com 466 (Vizag). 14. We have heard both the sides and find from the details that