BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 55Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai60Delhi30Surat16Pune14Kolkata14Ahmedabad12Bangalore4Chennai4Indore3Jaipur3Cochin3Lucknow3Hyderabad2SC2Raipur1Rajkot1Cuttack1Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 2(47)2

DCIT,CENT CIR-2(4), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. CLEAN CITY ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1624/HYD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad20 Feb 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Alankamonyassessment Year: 2011-12 Dy. Commissioner Of Vs. Clean City Estates Pvt. Ltd., Income-Tax, Hyderabad. Central Circle – 2(4), Hyderabad. Pan – Aaccc4799H Appellant Respondent Revenue By: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai Assessee By: Shri A.V. Raghuram Date Of Hearing: 11/12/2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 21/02/2020 O R D E R Per Smt. P. Madhavi Devi, J.M.:

For Appellant: Shri A.V. RaghuramFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai
Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 2(47)

55A of the Transfer of Property Act, at the cost of repetition, is only for the purpose of transfer under section 2(47) which, in turn, is relevant, as it states in so many words by using the expression “transfer", in relation to a capital asset, includes”, only for the purposes of capital assets under the Income

MOHD. ABDUL HAMEED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is partly allowed

ITA 1649/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Oct 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Deviita No. 1649/Hyd./2017 A.Y. 2008-09 Mohd. Abdul Hameed Vs. Ito, Ward 4 (3) D.No.2-4-663, Sundernagar Hyderabad Kachiguda Hyderabad Pan: Aecpm1492C (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Smt. S. Sandhya, A.RFor Respondent: Sh. A. Venkata Rao, D.R
Section 148Section 50CSection 55A

transfer of a part of immovable property bearing H.No.1-4- 341/1 and 1-4-342 admeasuring 434 sq.yards out of 721 sq.yards and as seen from the sale deed dated 07.01.2008, the assessee himself represented the vendor i.e. Mr. Mohd. Younus in the capacity of AGPA holder and not GPA holder. AO also examined Mr.Mohd. Younus on oath