BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 50Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai12Bangalore8Delhi7Chennai4Kolkata3Ahmedabad3Hyderabad3Karnataka2Surat1Jaipur1Pune1

Key Topics

Section 50C2Section 50C(1)2Section 50B2Section 50D2Capital Gains2

SUNITHA MALU,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-5(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1921/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Mar 2026AY 2018-19
Section 143(3)Section 50CSection 57

section 50D of the Act and adopted its prevalent market price based on the information retrieved through the portal “The Telangana Land Registration and Stamps Department”, as per which the market value of the property was Rs. 24,242/- per sq ft. Accordingly, the AO worked out the market value of the property at Rs. 7,67,19,580/- . Thereafter

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2, HYDERABAD vs. ARUDRA VELLANKI , HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 516/HYD/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri L. P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Goutam, (D.R.)For Respondent: Shri M.V. Joshi, C.A. for D.Shshank, Adv
Section 50BSection 50C(1)Section 50D

price only. Mr. Goutam sought to draw a distinction herein that it is section 50B which is sought to be applied in the learned lower authorities’ proceedings. We note that we are in Assessment Year 2012-13 whereas section 50D applies from 1.4.2013 only without having any retrospective effect. We therefore hold that the CIT(A) has rightly directed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2, HYDERABAD vs. PADMAVATHI VELLANKI , HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 517/HYD/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri L. P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Goutam, (D.R.)For Respondent: Shri M.V. Joshi, C.A. for D.Shshank, Adv
Section 50BSection 50C(1)Section 50D

price only. Mr. Goutam sought to draw a distinction herein that it is section 50B which is sought to be applied in the learned lower authorities’ proceedings. We note that we are in Assessment Year 2012-13 whereas section 50D applies from 1.4.2013 only without having any retrospective effect. We therefore hold that the CIT(A) has rightly directed