BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 50Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai68Delhi25Chennai20Raipur17Bangalore10Kolkata7Hyderabad7Ahmedabad5Cochin3Karnataka2Pune2SC1Amritsar1Calcutta1Indore1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 80I28Section 143(3)5Addition to Income5Section 153A4Section 50B4Deduction4Capital Gains3Section 22Section 50C(1)2Section 50D

JASPER AUTO SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

ITA 705/HYD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Oct 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year: 2014-15 Jasper Auto Services Pvt. Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Ltd., Hyderabad. Income-Tax, Circle – 2(1), Hyderabad. Pan – Aaccb 0196P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Smt. N. Swapna
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 2Section 50BSection 5O

price; and (ii) in any other case [not being a case falling under sub-clauses (i) to (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 49/, shall be taken to be nil;" 7.7.5 As such, subsequent to insertion of clause (a) to sub-section 2 of section 55 of the Act w.e.f AY 1995-96 onwards the consideration received on transfer

2

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. HES INFRA PVT LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA

ITA 606/HYD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakshmi, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri A. Srinivas, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

prices of materials, cost of laborers, overhead expenses etc. Therefore the Assessee is not merely a works contractor, but was engaged in development of project as a whole, and therefore, entitled for claim of deduction under section 80IA(4) of the Act, though not being the owner of the facility. It was contended that 14 M/s. HES Infra

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. HES INFRA PVT LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA

ITA 605/HYD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakshmi, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri A. Srinivas, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

prices of materials, cost of laborers, overhead expenses etc. Therefore the Assessee is not merely a works contractor, but was engaged in development of project as a whole, and therefore, entitled for claim of deduction under section 80IA(4) of the Act, though not being the owner of the facility. It was contended that 14 M/s. HES Infra

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. HES INFRA PVT LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA

ITA 604/HYD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakshmi, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri A. Srinivas, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

prices of materials, cost of laborers, overhead expenses etc. Therefore the Assessee is not merely a works contractor, but was engaged in development of project as a whole, and therefore, entitled for claim of deduction under section 80IA(4) of the Act, though not being the owner of the facility. It was contended that 14 M/s. HES Infra

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. HES INFRA PVT LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA

ITA 603/HYD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 Jul 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakshmi, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri A. Srinivas, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

prices of materials, cost of laborers, overhead expenses etc. Therefore the Assessee is not merely a works contractor, but was engaged in development of project as a whole, and therefore, entitled for claim of deduction under section 80IA(4) of the Act, though not being the owner of the facility. It was contended that 14 M/s. HES Infra

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2, HYDERABAD vs. ARUDRA VELLANKI , HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 516/HYD/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri L. P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Goutam, (D.R.)For Respondent: Shri M.V. Joshi, C.A. for D.Shshank, Adv
Section 50BSection 50C(1)Section 50D

price only. Mr. Goutam sought to draw a distinction herein that it is section 50B which is sought to be applied in the learned lower authorities’ proceedings. We note that we are in Assessment Year 2012-13 whereas section 50D applies from 1.4.2013 only without having any retrospective effect. We therefore hold that the CIT(A) has rightly directed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION )-2, HYDERABAD vs. PADMAVATHI VELLANKI , HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed in above terms

ITA 517/HYD/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Apr 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri L. P. Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Goutam, (D.R.)For Respondent: Shri M.V. Joshi, C.A. for D.Shshank, Adv
Section 50BSection 50C(1)Section 50D

price only. Mr. Goutam sought to draw a distinction herein that it is section 50B which is sought to be applied in the learned lower authorities’ proceedings. We note that we are in Assessment Year 2012-13 whereas section 50D applies from 1.4.2013 only without having any retrospective effect. We therefore hold that the CIT(A) has rightly directed