BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

84 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 269clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi292Mumbai267Karnataka244Bangalore94Hyderabad84Chennai59Jaipur49Indore41Kolkata27Ahmedabad25Pune25Chandigarh17Calcutta16Cochin15Cuttack9Telangana5Dehradun4Agra3Rajasthan3SC3Amritsar2Visakhapatnam2Jodhpur2Allahabad1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Addition to Income74Section 13263Search & Seizure55Section 10A51Section 153C48Section 6943Section 139(1)43Section 143(3)30Deduction

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-17(1), HYDERABAD vs. DR.REDDY'S LABORATORIES LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1232/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / "नधा"रण अपीलाथ" / "" यथ" /

For Appellant: Shri K.R.Sekar &For Respondent: 04/07/2022
Section 10B

269/- as transfer pricing adjustment. Before the Ld. CIT(A), assessee pleaded that during the assessment year 2006-07, the Tribunal in their own case ruled that the basis of interest shall be LIBOR+2% which is equivalent to 7% for the assessment year 2006-07. 5. Ld. CIT(A) followed the view taken by his predecessor in assessee

DR.REDDY'S LABORATORIES LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-17(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in ITA No

Showing 1–20 of 84 · Page 1 of 5

22
Section 143(2)14
Transfer Pricing12
Disallowance11
ITA 1328/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed
ITAT Hyderabad
08 Aug 2022
AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / "नधा"रण अपीलाथ" / "" यथ" /

For Appellant: Shri K.R.Sekar &For Respondent: 04/07/2022
Section 10B

269/- as transfer pricing adjustment. Before the Ld. CIT(A), assessee pleaded that during the assessment year 2006-07, the Tribunal in their own case ruled that the basis of interest shall be LIBOR+2% which is equivalent to 7% for the assessment year 2006-07. 5. Ld. CIT(A) followed the view taken by his predecessor in assessee

DR.REDDY'S LABORATORIES LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-17(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1268/HYD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / "नधा"रण अपीलाथ" / "" यथ" /

For Appellant: Shri K.R.Sekar &For Respondent: 04/07/2022
Section 10B

269/- as transfer pricing adjustment. Before the Ld. CIT(A), assessee pleaded that during the assessment year 2006-07, the Tribunal in their own case ruled that the basis of interest shall be LIBOR+2% which is equivalent to 7% for the assessment year 2006-07. 5. Ld. CIT(A) followed the view taken by his predecessor in assessee

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-17(1), HYDERABAD vs. DR.REDDY'S LABORATORIES LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1285/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / "नधा"रण अपीलाथ" / "" यथ" /

For Appellant: Shri K.R.Sekar &For Respondent: 04/07/2022
Section 10B

269/- as transfer pricing adjustment. Before the Ld. CIT(A), assessee pleaded that during the assessment year 2006-07, the Tribunal in their own case ruled that the basis of interest shall be LIBOR+2% which is equivalent to 7% for the assessment year 2006-07. 5. Ld. CIT(A) followed the view taken by his predecessor in assessee

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-17(1), HYDERABAD vs. DR.REDDY'S LABORATOREIS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1231/HYD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / "नधा"रण अपीलाथ" / "" यथ" /

For Appellant: Shri K.R.Sekar &For Respondent: 04/07/2022
Section 10B

269/- as transfer pricing adjustment. Before the Ld. CIT(A), assessee pleaded that during the assessment year 2006-07, the Tribunal in their own case ruled that the basis of interest shall be LIBOR+2% which is equivalent to 7% for the assessment year 2006-07. 5. Ld. CIT(A) followed the view taken by his predecessor in assessee

DR.REDDY'S LABORATORIES LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-17(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 1269/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad08 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / "नधा"रण अपीलाथ" / "" यथ" /

For Appellant: Shri K.R.Sekar &For Respondent: 04/07/2022
Section 10B

269/- as transfer pricing adjustment. Before the Ld. CIT(A), assessee pleaded that during the assessment year 2006-07, the Tribunal in their own case ruled that the basis of interest shall be LIBOR+2% which is equivalent to 7% for the assessment year 2006-07. 5. Ld. CIT(A) followed the view taken by his predecessor in assessee

INFOR (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CIRCLE -2(1), HYDERABAD

Appeal is partly allowed in above terms

ITA 198/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 Oct 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Dr.Sunil Moti Lala, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.Srinivas, DR
Section 143(3)Section 92C(3)

Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) therefore. 4.1. Coming to M/s.Tata Elxsi Limited, we note that the tribunal’s foregoing earlier order(s) have directed exclusion of the instant third entity as well whilst holding that this company is engaged in various activities including product design services and trading wherein no segmental information was available. Learned departmental representative fails to pin point

INFOR (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

Accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 193/HYD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Oct 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / Ita-Tp No. 193/Hyd/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Infor (India) Private Limited, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Hyderabad Of Income Tax, [Pan No. Aaacb6197Q] Circle-2(1), Hyderabad अपीलार्थीर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Moti Lala, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 260

section 260 and 144B of the Act. Hence the assessee is in appeal before us challenging the final assessment orders pursuant to the directions made by the Learned DRP. 5. Grounds No. 1 ,2 and 16 to 18 of this appeal are general in nature. Grounds No. 3 to 8 relate to the Transfer Pricing adjustment on account of provision

SGD PHARMA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,,HYDERABAD vs. ITO WARD-3(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 477/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita-Tp Nos.130 & 447/Hyd/2022 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19) M/S. Sgd Pharma India Vs. Dy.Cit/I.T.O Private Limited, Ward/Circle 3 (1) Mahabubnagar Hyderabad Pan:Aadcc7815K (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Aliasgar Rampurwala, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Smt. K. Haritha, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 17/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 21/01/2026 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.:

For Appellant: Shri Aliasgar Rampurwala, CAFor Respondent: : Smt. K. Haritha, CIT(DR)
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144C(1)Section 144C(13)Section 153Section 43BSection 92C

Transfer Pricing Officer (“Ld. TPO”) under section 92CA(1) of the Act. The Ld. TPO, vide order dated 28.01.2021, proposed an upward adjustment of Rs.2,28,23,848/- in respect of the international transaction relating to interest on External Commercial Borrowings (“ECB”). Based on the said order, the Ld. AO passed a draft assessment order dated 13.04.2021. 5. Aggrieved

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 867/HYD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

269 to 274/CIT(A)-12/Hyd/2014-15 dated 31.03.2015 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2005-06 to 2010-11 and CIT(A) order No.ITA NO.277/CIT(A)- 1/GNT/2011-12 dated 30.03.2016 for the A.Y.2004-05. The Department had filed the appeals challenging the orders of the Ld.CIT(A). For the A.Y.2004-05 to 2006-07, the department challenged the order of the Ld.CIT

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 864/HYD/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

269 to 274/CIT(A)-12/Hyd/2014-15 dated 31.03.2015 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2005-06 to 2010-11 and CIT(A) order No.ITA NO.277/CIT(A)- 1/GNT/2011-12 dated 30.03.2016 for the A.Y.2004-05. The Department had filed the appeals challenging the orders of the Ld.CIT(A). For the A.Y.2004-05 to 2006-07, the department challenged the order of the Ld.CIT

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 865/HYD/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

269 to 274/CIT(A)-12/Hyd/2014-15 dated 31.03.2015 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2005-06 to 2010-11 and CIT(A) order No.ITA NO.277/CIT(A)- 1/GNT/2011-12 dated 30.03.2016 for the A.Y.2004-05. The Department had filed the appeals challenging the orders of the Ld.CIT(A). For the A.Y.2004-05 to 2006-07, the department challenged the order of the Ld.CIT

ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 833/HYD/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

269 to 274/CIT(A)-12/Hyd/2014-15 dated 31.03.2015 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2005-06 to 2010-11 and CIT(A) order No.ITA NO.277/CIT(A)- 1/GNT/2011-12 dated 30.03.2016 for the A.Y.2004-05. The Department had filed the appeals challenging the orders of the Ld.CIT(A). For the A.Y.2004-05 to 2006-07, the department challenged the order of the Ld.CIT

ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 832/HYD/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

269 to 274/CIT(A)-12/Hyd/2014-15 dated 31.03.2015 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2005-06 to 2010-11 and CIT(A) order No.ITA NO.277/CIT(A)- 1/GNT/2011-12 dated 30.03.2016 for the A.Y.2004-05. The Department had filed the appeals challenging the orders of the Ld.CIT(A). For the A.Y.2004-05 to 2006-07, the department challenged the order of the Ld.CIT

ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 831/HYD/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

269 to 274/CIT(A)-12/Hyd/2014-15 dated 31.03.2015 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2005-06 to 2010-11 and CIT(A) order No.ITA NO.277/CIT(A)- 1/GNT/2011-12 dated 30.03.2016 for the A.Y.2004-05. The Department had filed the appeals challenging the orders of the Ld.CIT(A). For the A.Y.2004-05 to 2006-07, the department challenged the order of the Ld.CIT

ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 834/HYD/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

269 to 274/CIT(A)-12/Hyd/2014-15 dated 31.03.2015 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2005-06 to 2010-11 and CIT(A) order No.ITA NO.277/CIT(A)- 1/GNT/2011-12 dated 30.03.2016 for the A.Y.2004-05. The Department had filed the appeals challenging the orders of the Ld.CIT(A). For the A.Y.2004-05 to 2006-07, the department challenged the order of the Ld.CIT

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 869/HYD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

269 to 274/CIT(A)-12/Hyd/2014-15 dated 31.03.2015 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2005-06 to 2010-11 and CIT(A) order No.ITA NO.277/CIT(A)- 1/GNT/2011-12 dated 30.03.2016 for the A.Y.2004-05. The Department had filed the appeals challenging the orders of the Ld.CIT(A). For the A.Y.2004-05 to 2006-07, the department challenged the order of the Ld.CIT

ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 836/HYD/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

269 to 274/CIT(A)-12/Hyd/2014-15 dated 31.03.2015 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2005-06 to 2010-11 and CIT(A) order No.ITA NO.277/CIT(A)- 1/GNT/2011-12 dated 30.03.2016 for the A.Y.2004-05. The Department had filed the appeals challenging the orders of the Ld.CIT(A). For the A.Y.2004-05 to 2006-07, the department challenged the order of the Ld.CIT

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 866/HYD/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

269 to 274/CIT(A)-12/Hyd/2014-15 dated 31.03.2015 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2005-06 to 2010-11 and CIT(A) order No.ITA NO.277/CIT(A)- 1/GNT/2011-12 dated 30.03.2016 for the A.Y.2004-05. The Department had filed the appeals challenging the orders of the Ld.CIT(A). For the A.Y.2004-05 to 2006-07, the department challenged the order of the Ld.CIT

ANNAPURNA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue are partly allowed and the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 835/HYD/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Dec 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhappellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri S.Rama Rao, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 10ASection 132

269 to 274/CIT(A)-12/Hyd/2014-15 dated 31.03.2015 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2005-06 to 2010-11 and CIT(A) order No.ITA NO.277/CIT(A)- 1/GNT/2011-12 dated 30.03.2016 for the A.Y.2004-05. The Department had filed the appeals challenging the orders of the Ld.CIT(A). For the A.Y.2004-05 to 2006-07, the department challenged the order of the Ld.CIT