BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 246A(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi79Mumbai37Bangalore21Chennai13Chandigarh8Kolkata6Pune5Jaipur4Hyderabad3SC3Dehradun2Panaji1Nagpur1Indore1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 118Section 1394Section 139(1)2Section 115J2Exemption2Addition to Income2

HYDERABAD METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of assessee and Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 271/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya –
Section 11Section 139Section 139(1)

246A of the Act before ld.CIT(A)-3, who vide order dt.31.05.2022 partly allowed the appeal of assessee. 6. Feeling aggrieved with the order of ld.CIT(A), assessee and Revenue both are now in appeal before us for the grounds mentioned hereinabove. 7. Before us, ld. AR submitted that due to delay of two days in filing return of income

DCIT, EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE, HYDERABAD vs. HYDERABAD METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SECUNDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals of assessee and Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 326/HYD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Ms. SandhyaFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya –
Section 11Section 139Section 139(1)

246A of the Act before ld.CIT(A)-3, who vide order dt.31.05.2022 partly allowed the appeal of assessee. 6. Feeling aggrieved with the order of ld.CIT(A), assessee and Revenue both are now in appeal before us for the grounds mentioned hereinabove. 7. Before us, ld. AR submitted that due to delay of two days in filing return of income

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-16(2), , HYDERABAD vs. MYLAN LABORATORIES LIMITED (BEING THE AMALGAMATED COMPANY OF ASTRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED), , HYDERABAD

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1666/HYD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Mar 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

For Appellant: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Smt. N. Swapna, DR
Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 246ASection 92ASection 92C

B”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 1666/HYD/2017 Assessment Year: 2012-13 Dy. Commissioner of M/s. Mylan Laboratories Income Tax, Vs Limited, (Being the amalgamated Circle-16(2), company of Astrix HYDERABAD Laboratories Limited), HYDERABAD [PAN: AADCM3491M] (Appellant) (Respondent) For Revenue : Smt. N. Swapna, DR For Assessee : Shri