BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “section 68”+ Section 55Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai56Delhi28Kolkata9Bangalore6Raipur6Surat5Jaipur3Pune3Chennai2Hyderabad2Rajkot2Ahmedabad2SC1Chandigarh1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 1322Section 153A2Unexplained Cash Credit2Addition to Income2Search & Seizure2

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. C VAMSI KRISHNA , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 543/HYD/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Nov 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan, CAFor Respondent: Shri M. Satish, DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 68 of the I. T. Act. He accordingly submitted that the order passed by the learned CIT (A) being not in conformity with the facts of the case should be set aside and the ground raised by the assessee be allowed. 34. The ld DR, on the other hand, heavily relied on the order of the learned

C.VAMSI KRISHNA ,HYDERABAD vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 526/HYD/2020[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Nov 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan, CAFor Respondent: Shri M. Satish, DR
Section 132Section 153A

section 68 of the I. T. Act. He accordingly submitted that the order passed by the learned CIT (A) being not in conformity with the facts of the case should be set aside and the ground raised by the assessee be allowed. 34. The ld DR, on the other hand, heavily relied on the order of the learned