BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 54Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh27Delhi26Indore17Ahmedabad15Jaipur13Mumbai13Bangalore11Raipur9Chennai8Pune8Surat7Agra4Hyderabad3Karnataka3Telangana3SC2Amritsar2Rajkot2Nagpur1Calcutta1Jodhpur1Kolkata1Allahabad1Lucknow1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 54F10Section 404Section 54B4Section 143(3)3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 40A(3)2Section 133A2Exemption2Survey u/s 133A

GUNDALA SARVOTTAM RAO,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-11(3), HYDERABAD

The appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 1668/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / प्रत् यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri K.C.Devdas, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar, DR
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 54BSection 54F

68,790/- respectively. Assessee declared agricultural income of Rs. 3,12,500/-. Assessment under section 143(3) of Act was complete by order dated 31/12/2011 denying the claim of the assessee for exemption under section 54F and 54B

GUNDALA MAHENDER,,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-11(3), HYDERABAD

2

The appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 1669/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Aug 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / निर्धारण वर्ा / अपीलधर्थी / प्रत् यर्थी /

For Appellant: Shri K.C.Devdas, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Mujumdar, DR
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 54BSection 54F

68,790/- respectively. Assessee declared agricultural income of Rs. 3,12,500/-. Assessment under section 143(3) of Act was complete by order dated 31/12/2011 denying the claim of the assessee for exemption under section 54F and 54B

DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes on the above terms

ITA 156/HYD/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 Feb 2024AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Respondent: Ms. T. Vijaya Lakhsmi, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 40A(3)Section 40a

section is very clear and the appellant has incurred the expenditure and the appellant has made the payment to the various parties and persons. The appellant has, to circumvent, not accounted for the same and has also not brought out any evidence from M/s.DLF that they have accounted for such transactions in their books as cash payments