VENU MYNENI,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-II, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri D. Manmohan & Shri B. Ramakotaiah

46A of the I.T. Rules, 1962. There is a long time gap between the withdrawal of cash by the assessee and re-deposit of the same in the appellant's account. The source for entire cash deposits added by the Assessing Officer is not proved by the appellant. 11.7 Even if provisions of Section 68

VK WAREHOUSING ENTERPRISES,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee firm and the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purposes, in terms of our observations recorded hereinabove

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.737/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2017-18) M/S. V K Warehousing Enterprises, Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Vs. Circle 6(1), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aakfv3288R (Appellant) (Respondent) आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.881/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2017-18) Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, M/S. V K Warehousing Enterprises, Circle 6(1), Hyderabad. Vs. Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Rajesh Vaishnav, C.A. राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Shri P. Dhivahar, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 22/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 07/01/2026

46A to examine the additional evidence submitted by the assessee with regards to the issue of deduction claimed u/s. 801B of the Act vis-à-vis expenditure claimed under 'any other amount allowable as deduction'. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in law in granting relief of taxation under normal provisions of the I.T. Act, where the addition was made

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, WARANGAL vs. SHIVA KUMAR THOTA, WARANGAL

In the result, the primary objection filed by the assessee vide his letter, dated 02/06/2025 is allowed while for the appeal filed by

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.996/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18) Income Tax Officer, Vs. Shiva Kumar Thota, Ward-1, Warangal. Warangal. Pan: Aaopt4519M (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri K.A. Sai Prasad, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Mrs. U. Mini Chandran, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 18/11/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 10/12/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, J.M: The Present Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, Dated 06/08/2024 Which In Turn Arises From The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer Under Section 147 R.W.S 144B Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (For Short, “The Act”), Dated 26/05/2023 For The Assessment Year 2017-18. The Revenue Has Assailed The Impugned Order On The Following Grounds Of Appeal Before Us:

46A of the Income Tax Rules. 4. Any other grounds that may arise during the hearing will be submitted before Hon’ble ITAT with kind permission.” 2. Also, the revenue has raised an additional grounds of appeal, as under: “Notice u/s 148 issued on 29/07/2022, in respect of initial notice under section 148, dated 28/06/2021, and reply on 01/06/2022

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMTED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FOODS FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD vs. AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

AGRI GOLD FARM ESTATES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), HYDERABAD

Accordingly. The grounds of appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue for the assessment year 2011-12 are accordingly treated as allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं निर्धारण अपीलधर्थी प्रत् यर्थी वर्ा/ A.Y. / Ita No. / Appellant / Respondent 202/Hyd/2018 2009-10 1222/Hyd/2018 2010-11

section 68 of the Act by treating the share premium and the share capital received in cash as un-explained cash credits. Learned Assessing Officer also made an addition under the head ‘income from other sources’. 3. Assessee preferred appeal before the learned CIT(A) and produced additional evidence under rule 46A

DCIT., CIRCLE-3(1) , HYDERABAD vs. SOUTH ASIAN CERAMIC TILES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

section 68 regarding unsecured loans: Rs.38,30,75,528/-. 7. Aggrieved, the assessee company carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A), who allowed the same and vacated all the aforementioned three additions that were made by the AO. 8. The revenue being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(A) has carried the matter in appeal before