DILEEP KUMAR SAKAMURI CHENCHU VENKATA,SRIKALAHASTI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), TIRUPATI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Us:

68,428/- as the assessee’s income from other sources. 5. Thereafter, the assessee furnished before the AO documentary evidence in the course of the assessment proceedings, viz. the bank 4 Dileep Kumar Sakamuri Chenchu Venkata vs. ITO statements, cash-flow statements, computation of income, balance sheet, sales/purchase ledgers and an amended partnership deed, but did not furnish corroborative documents