BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

124 results for “section 68”+ Section 292Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi412Mumbai145Hyderabad124Bangalore121Jaipur115Chennai102Surat40Indore39Pune38Kolkata38Chandigarh35Rajkot24Nagpur20Ahmedabad15Amritsar13Visakhapatnam12Jodhpur8Allahabad6Lucknow3Raipur2Karnataka1Guwahati1Agra1Patna1Telangana1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Addition to Income73Section 13261Search & Seizure54Section 153C47Section 6841Section 6939Section 139(1)35Section 143(3)18Section 143(2)14

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE3-(1), HYDERABAD vs. VAISHNAVI BULLION PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, we uphold the addition of Rs

ITA 58/HYD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Bhaskar Reddy
Section 131Section 68

292C are clear and cast the onus of proving the genuineness or otherwise of the books on the assessee only. The provisions of the section read as under : “Where any books 'of account,- other: documents, money .... is found in the possession or control of any person in the course of survey u/s 133A, it may, in any proceedings under

MUSADDILAL GEMS JEWELS PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, we uphold the addition of Rs

Showing 1–20 of 124 · Page 1 of 7

Section 142(1)13
Survey u/s 133A9
Limitation/Time-bar8
ITA 560/HYD/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Bhaskar Reddy
Section 131Section 68

292C are clear and cast the onus of proving the genuineness or otherwise of the books on the assessee only. The provisions of the section read as under : “Where any books 'of account,- other: documents, money .... is found in the possession or control of any person in the course of survey u/s 133A, it may, in any proceedings under

VAISHNAVI BULLION PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, we uphold the addition of Rs

ITA 561/HYD/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Bhaskar Reddy
Section 131Section 68

292C are clear and cast the onus of proving the genuineness or otherwise of the books on the assessee only. The provisions of the section read as under : “Where any books 'of account,- other: documents, money .... is found in the possession or control of any person in the course of survey u/s 133A, it may, in any proceedings under

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE3-(1), HYDERABAD vs. M/S. MUSADDILAL GEMS AND JEWELS PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, we uphold the addition of Rs

ITA 59/HYD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Gupta, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Bhaskar Reddy
Section 131Section 68

292C are clear and cast the onus of proving the genuineness or otherwise of the books on the assessee only. The provisions of the section read as under : “Where any books 'of account,- other: documents, money .... is found in the possession or control of any person in the course of survey u/s 133A, it may, in any proceedings under

PURUSHOTHAM NAIDU LEKKALA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1726/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 115BSection 132Section 153DSection 292CSection 4Section 65B

292C of the Income-tax Act, 1961", "Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961", "Section 69C of the Income

LEKCON INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), HYDERABAD

ITA 1725/HYD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 115BSection 132Section 153DSection 292CSection 4Section 65B

68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961", "Section 69C of the Income-tax Act, 1961", "Section 292C of the Income

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SRI ADITYA HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result the appeal I

ITA 98/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

For Appellant: Shri AV Raghuram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR

section-4 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is fully satisfied without any uncertainty or vagueness, no tax can be levied. In 59 ITA.Nos.262 to 268/Hyd./2025, ITA.No.98/Hyd./2025 And C.O.Nos.9, 10 & 11/Hyd./2025 this regard, he relied upon decision of ITAT, Jabalpur Bench in the case of ACIT vs., Satyapal Wassan [2008] 5 DTR_TRIB

DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. UNITED DEVELOPER, HYDERABAD

In the result, the cross-objections file d by the assessee firm in A

ITA 452/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Us As A Cross-Objector. Since Common Issues Are Involved In The Captioned Appeals & Cross-Objections, Therefore, The Same Have Been Taken Up & Disposed Of By A Consolidated Order. We Shall First Take Up The Appeal Filed By The Revenue & The Cross- Objection Of The Assessee Firm For A.Y.2016-17 & The Order Therein Passed Shall Apply Mutatis Mutandis For The Purpose Of Disposing Of The Other Appeal & Cross-Objection.

Section 132Section 153C

292C of the Act, as per which the seized document, viz., Page 38 of Annexure A/JRFM/05 was to be presumed to be belonging to either Shri. Surender Jindal (supra) i.e. the owner of the laptop or M/s Jitender Roller Flour Mills, i.e. the searched concern in whose premises the laptop was found lying in the course of the search proceedings

DCIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(1),, HYDERABAD vs. UNITED DEVELOPER, HYDERABAD

In the result, the cross-objections file d by the assessee firm in A

ITA 453/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Us As A Cross-Objector. Since Common Issues Are Involved In The Captioned Appeals & Cross-Objections, Therefore, The Same Have Been Taken Up & Disposed Of By A Consolidated Order. We Shall First Take Up The Appeal Filed By The Revenue & The Cross- Objection Of The Assessee Firm For A.Y.2016-17 & The Order Therein Passed Shall Apply Mutatis Mutandis For The Purpose Of Disposing Of The Other Appeal & Cross-Objection.

Section 132Section 153C

292C of the Act, as per which the seized document, viz., Page 38 of Annexure A/JRFM/05 was to be presumed to be belonging to either Shri. Surender Jindal (supra) i.e. the owner of the laptop or M/s Jitender Roller Flour Mills, i.e. the searched concern in whose premises the laptop was found lying in the course of the search proceedings

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 279/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT( DR)
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139

68,967/- TOTAL Rs.37,69,70,390/- 12. In appeal, the learned CIT (A), for the reasons stated in their appellate order dated 19.01.2024 allowed partial relief in respect of additions made towards suppression of sales and out of addition made by the ld. AO for six Asst. Years for Rs.37,69,70,390/-, has deleted Rs.22

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 278/HYD/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT( DR)
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139

68,967/- TOTAL Rs.37,69,70,390/- 12. In appeal, the learned CIT (A), for the reasons stated in their appellate order dated 19.01.2024 allowed partial relief in respect of additions made towards suppression of sales and out of addition made by the ld. AO for six Asst. Years for Rs.37,69,70,390/-, has deleted Rs.22

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 275/HYD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT( DR)
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139

68,967/- TOTAL Rs.37,69,70,390/- 12. In appeal, the learned CIT (A), for the reasons stated in their appellate order dated 19.01.2024 allowed partial relief in respect of additions made towards suppression of sales and out of addition made by the ld. AO for six Asst. Years for Rs.37,69,70,390/-, has deleted Rs.22

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 219/HYD/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT( DR)
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139

68,967/- TOTAL Rs.37,69,70,390/- 12. In appeal, the learned CIT (A), for the reasons stated in their appellate order dated 19.01.2024 allowed partial relief in respect of additions made towards suppression of sales and out of addition made by the ld. AO for six Asst. Years for Rs.37,69,70,390/-, has deleted Rs.22

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 215/HYD/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT( DR)
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139

68,967/- TOTAL Rs.37,69,70,390/- 12. In appeal, the learned CIT (A), for the reasons stated in their appellate order dated 19.01.2024 allowed partial relief in respect of additions made towards suppression of sales and out of addition made by the ld. AO for six Asst. Years for Rs.37,69,70,390/-, has deleted Rs.22

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 216/HYD/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT( DR)
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139

68,967/- TOTAL Rs.37,69,70,390/- 12. In appeal, the learned CIT (A), for the reasons stated in their appellate order dated 19.01.2024 allowed partial relief in respect of additions made towards suppression of sales and out of addition made by the ld. AO for six Asst. Years for Rs.37,69,70,390/-, has deleted Rs.22

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 217/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Aug 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT( DR)
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139

68,967/- TOTAL Rs.37,69,70,390/- 12. In appeal, the learned CIT (A), for the reasons stated in their appellate order dated 19.01.2024 allowed partial relief in respect of additions made towards suppression of sales and out of addition made by the ld. AO for six Asst. Years for Rs.37,69,70,390/-, has deleted Rs.22

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 218/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT( DR)
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139

68,967/- TOTAL Rs.37,69,70,390/- 12. In appeal, the learned CIT (A), for the reasons stated in their appellate order dated 19.01.2024 allowed partial relief in respect of additions made towards suppression of sales and out of addition made by the ld. AO for six Asst. Years for Rs.37,69,70,390/-, has deleted Rs.22

GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 214/HYD/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT( DR)
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139

68,967/- TOTAL Rs.37,69,70,390/- 12. In appeal, the learned CIT (A), for the reasons stated in their appellate order dated 19.01.2024 allowed partial relief in respect of additions made towards suppression of sales and out of addition made by the ld. AO for six Asst. Years for Rs.37,69,70,390/-, has deleted Rs.22

ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD vs. GIRIDHARI CONSTRUCTIONS, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 280/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri Kumar Pranav, CIT( DR)
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 139

68,967/- TOTAL Rs.37,69,70,390/- 12. In appeal, the learned CIT (A), for the reasons stated in their appellate order dated 19.01.2024 allowed partial relief in respect of additions made towards suppression of sales and out of addition made by the ld. AO for six Asst. Years for Rs.37,69,70,390/-, has deleted Rs.22

VSN AND JEEVAN INFRA DEVELOPERS, PERURU PANCHAYAT,TIRUPATHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 707/HYD/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Nov 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.707/Hyd/2017 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10) Vsn & Jeevan Infra Vs. Dy.Cit Developers, Peruru Central Circle Panchayat, Tirupati Tirupati Pan:Aaifv3414B (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Advocate H Srinivasulu राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 04/11/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 19/11/2025 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.: This Appeal Is Filed By Vsn & Jeevan Infra Developers (“The Assessee”), Feeling Aggrieved By The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Visakhapatnam (“Ld. Cit(A)”) Dated 21.02.2017 For The A.Y 2009- 10. Page 1 Of 12

For Appellant: Advocate H SrinivasuluFor Respondent: : Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153Section 153CSection 68

68 of the Act on account of a unsecured loan received by the assessee from Shri Jayadeva Naidu, and the third issue relates to a legal ground wherein the assessee has challenged the validity of the assessment proceedings. 8. As regards the addition of Rs. 1.80 crores on account of alleged on-money received from M.G. Brothers