BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 206Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore81Delhi61Chennai36Karnataka21Mumbai20Ahmedabad15Kolkata5Indore4Rajkot4Jaipur4Hyderabad3Varanasi2Agra2Cochin1Chandigarh1Raipur1Amritsar1SC1Uttarakhand1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 689Section 115J4Section 36(1)(va)4Unexplained Cash Credit3Addition to Income3Section 253(2)2Disallowance2Limitation/Time-bar2

LALITHA PADMAJA THALLAPALLI,KURNOOL vs. ITO., WARD-1, KURNOOL

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1243/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Dec 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

Section 143(3)Section 68Section 69A

206C(1D) of the Act. Since the assessee has failed to prove the cash receipt with relevant evidences, the A.O. has rightly made addition under Section 68

LAMPEX ELECTRONICS LIMITED ,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 589/HYD/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad
17 Oct 2022
AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P.N.Moorthy, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 115JSection 253(2)Section 36(1)(va)Section 68

68 of the Act. 9. On this aspect, Learned AR submitted that the authorities did not seek any explanation from the assessee after submitting the books even Page 4 of 10 ITA Nos.589/Hyd/2020, 96/Hyd/2021 C.O.No.6/Hyd/2021 the Learned CIT(A) also did not give an opportunity to the assessee to explain the discrepancies in the invoices, which according to them

ACIT, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. LAMPEX ELECTRONICS LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 96/HYD/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Oct 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri P.N.Moorthy, ARFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 115JSection 253(2)Section 36(1)(va)Section 68

68 of the Act. 9. On this aspect, Learned AR submitted that the authorities did not seek any explanation from the assessee after submitting the books even Page 4 of 10 ITA Nos.589/Hyd/2020, 96/Hyd/2021 C.O.No.6/Hyd/2021 the Learned CIT(A) also did not give an opportunity to the assessee to explain the discrepancies in the invoices, which according to them