BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 167Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai13Pune5Delhi3Hyderabad3Bangalore2Panaji2Jaipur1

Key Topics

Section 683Section 115B2Section 402Deduction2TDS2Rectification u/s 1542

SPECTRA EQUIPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(1),, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 500/HYD/2023[Assessment Year 2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 Dec 2024

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaassessment Year: 2017-18 Spectra Equipment Private Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1), Limited, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan No.Aaccs8677C. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Ms. Akanksha, C.A. For Shri Sunil Kumar Jain, C.A. Revenue By: Ms. Narmada, Cit-Dr For Shri Madan Mohan Meena, Sr.D.R. Date Of Hearing: 11.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 18.12.2024

For Appellant: Ms. Akanksha, C.AFor Respondent: Ms. Narmada, CIT-DR for Shri Madan Mohan Meena
Section 115BSection 131Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

167B, as the case may be, or the rate or rates of income-tax specified in this behalf in the Finance Act of the relevant year, whichever is applicable ; (ii) for the purposes of deduction of tax under sections 193, 194, 194A, 194B, 194BB and 194D, the rate or rates of income-tax specified in this behalf

TECHTRANS CONSTRUCTION (I) PVT.LTD. KCPL-JV,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-6(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1056/HYD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri K.C.Devdas, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 40

68,73,26,650/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 6. Apart from this, learned Assessing Officer noticed that the receipts as per form 26AS statement was about Rs. 94,08,92,854/- whereas the receipts as per P&L Account were only Rs. 90,10,92,199/-, resulting in variation

ITO, WARD-6(2), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. TECHTRANS CONSTRUCTIONS (I) PVT.LTD., HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, both the appeals are treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 892/HYD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri K.C.Devdas, ARFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT-DR
Section 40

68,73,26,650/- under section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. 6. Apart from this, learned Assessing Officer noticed that the receipts as per form 26AS statement was about Rs. 94,08,92,854/- whereas the receipts as per P&L Account were only Rs. 90,10,92,199/-, resulting in variation