BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 144B(1)(xvi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi65Jaipur10Chandigarh9Mumbai8Hyderabad3Rajkot2Visakhapatnam1Bangalore1Jodhpur1Nagpur1Raipur1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 69A3Unexplained Investment3Addition to Income3Natural Justice3Section 1472Section 2502Section 22Section 144B2Section 692

KRISHNAKUMAR MANDA,MEDCHAL vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-12(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1016/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos. 1016 & 1017/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2021-22) Shri Krishnakumar Manda, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Medchal Income Tax Pan:Bmspm9739D Circle 12(1) Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Phaneendra Nag, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 11/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 19/12/2025 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.:

For Appellant: Shri Phaneendra Nag, CAFor Respondent: : Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 2Section 250Section 69

xvi) & (xviii) of Sub section 2 of Section 144B i.e. in not serving the Draft assessment order along with Show Cause notice before finalizing the assessment, which would amount to breach of not only Principles of Natural Justice but also of the action in complete disregard to the Statutory Provision. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to appreciate

House Property2
Cash Deposit2
Condonation of Delay2

KRISHNAKUMAR MANDA,MEDCHAL vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-12(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1017/HYD/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Dec 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Ravish Sooda N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos. 1016 & 1017/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2021-22) Shri Krishnakumar Manda, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Medchal Income Tax Pan:Bmspm9739D Circle 12(1) Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Phaneendra Nag, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 11/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 19/12/2025 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.:

For Appellant: Shri Phaneendra Nag, CAFor Respondent: : Shri S. Arun Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 2Section 250Section 69

xvi) & (xviii) of Sub section 2 of Section 144B i.e. in not serving the Draft assessment order along with Show Cause notice before finalizing the assessment, which would amount to breach of not only Principles of Natural Justice but also of the action in complete disregard to the Statutory Provision. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to appreciate

KASIREDDY SASIKALAMMA,NELLORE vs. ITO., WARD -1, GUDUR

ITA 225/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad06 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Us:

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Helen Ruby Jesindha
Section 147Section 148Section 68Section 69ASection 69BSection 69C

Section 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) dated 26.03.2022 for A.Y. 2017-18. The assessee has assailed the impugned order on the following grounds of appeal before us: “(i) The order of the Assessing Officer/CIT(A) is erroneous, is contrary to law, principles of natural justice and opposed to the facts