Search: reassessment u/s 147

3 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 5Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai31 Delhi29 Raipur17 Jaipur13 Chennai12 Bangalore8 Cochin6 Panaji5 Kolkata5 Pune4 Hyderabad3 Indore3 Surat2 Guwahati2 Visakhapatnam1 Cuttack1 Karnataka1 Lucknow1 Patna1 Rajkot1 Ranchi1 Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 456 Section 2(47)(v)5 Section 1485 Section 1474 Section 139(1)4 Section 270A3 Capital Gains3

ITO (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1, HYDERABAD vs. MIKKILINENI NARENDRA KUMAR, SERILINGAMPALLY

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 882/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad19 Dec 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaassessment Year: 2016-17 The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Mikkilineni Narendra Kumar, Serilingampally, International Taxation – 1 Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Nenpk4757J. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri H. Srinivasulu, Advocate Revenue By: Ms. M. Narmada, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.12.2024 19.12.2024 Date Of Pronouncement:

For Appellant: Shri H. Srinivasulu, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. M. Narmada, CIT-DR

Section 2(47)Section 2(47)(v)Section 53A

reassessment proceedings u/s 147 were initiated for the A.Y. 2016-17 and a notice was issued on 30.03.2021. In response to this notice, assessee has not filed any return but submitted the information stating that he has not entered/executed any sale deed during the relevant A.Y. 2016-17 has only entered into a modified development Agreement cum general power

ITO (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1, HYDERABAD vs. MIKKILINENI NARENDRA KUMAR, SERILINGAMPALLY

ITO (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-1, HYDERABAD vs. MIKKILINENI NARENDRA KUMAR, SERILINGAMPALLY

SUBBALAKSHMAMMA PINNAMA,THUMMALAGUNTA,TIRUPATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), TIRUPATI

RAJU SURYANARAYANA ALLURI,USA vs. ITO (INT TAXN)-1, HYDERABAD