BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Section 80C(2)(xvii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad2Lucknow2

Key Topics

Section 106Section 1474Section 80C4Section 1483Section 143(3)2Section 250(6)2Section 80C(2)(xvii)2Section 270A2Exemption2Deduction2Penalty2Reassessment2

VEERA REDDY POSHAM,NALGONDA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, ITA.No.1830/Hyd

ITA 1829/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Mar 2026AY 2020-21
For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR
Section 10Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250(6)Section 270ASection 80CSection 80C(2)(xvii)

2)(xvii).\n•\nThe authorities below failed to call for or verify the\ndocumentary evidence before making the disallowance; the\naddition is therefore unjustified and liable to be deleted.\nE. Disallowance of HRA Exemption u/s 10(13A) - Rs.1,08,000\n•\nThe learned CIT(A) erred in confirming disallowance of\nRs.1,08,000 claimed u/s 10(13A) towards House Rent

VEERA REDDY POSHAM,NALGONDA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, ITA.No.1830/Hyd

ITA 1830/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Mar 2026AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita.Nos.1829 & 1830/Hyd/2025 Assessment Years 2020-2021 & 2022-2023 Veera Reddy Posham, The Acit, Nalgonda – 508 246 Central Circle-1(1), Vs. Telangana. Hyderabad. Telangana. Pan Aijpp0376P (Applicant) (Respondent) -None- िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By : राज" व "ारा/Revenue By : Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 09.03.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 13.03.2026 आदेश/Order Per Vijay Pal Rao:

For Respondent: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR
Section 10Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234FSection 250(6)Section 270ASection 80CSection 80C(2)(xvii)

2)(xvii).  The authorities below failed to call for or verify the documentary evidence before making the disallowance; the addition is therefore unjustified and liable to be deleted. E. Disallowance of HRA Exemption u/s 10(13A) - Rs.1,08,000  The learned CIT(A) erred in confirming disallowance of Rs.1,08,000 claimed u/s 10(13A) towards House Rent Allowance, ignoring