BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

41 results for “reassessment”+ Section 801A(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai53Hyderabad41Delhi31Indore15Chennai14Kolkata9Ahmedabad8Surat8Rajkot7Patna6Jodhpur5Bangalore4Jaipur4Lucknow3Nagpur2Chandigarh2Raipur1Pune1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 153A57Section 80I51Section 143(3)44Section 139(1)30Section 13222Search & Seizure21Deduction16Section 143(1)15Penalty14Section 80

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(2), HYDERBAD vs. SEW INFRASTUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1723/HYD/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Feb 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: CA MV Prasad AndFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 801A(4)Section 80I

801A(4) in terms of provision of section\n80AC, the Id CIT(A) has erred in law in giving her\nfinding that deduction not claimed in original return u/s\n139(1) cannot be denied if claimed pursuant to notice\nu/s 153A.\nii.\nWhether on the facts and circumstances of the case,\nand in law, the Id. CIT(A) erred

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1722/HYD/2017[2014-15]Status: Disposed

Showing 1–20 of 41 · Page 1 of 3

12
Addition to Income12
Section 919
ITAT Hyderabad
26 Feb 2025
AY 2014-15
For Appellant: CA MV Prasad AndFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 80I

801A(4) in terms of provision of section\n80AC, the Id CIT(A) has erred in law in giving her\nfinding that deduction not claimed in original return u/s\n139(1) cannot be denied if claimed pursuant to notice\nu/s 153A.\nii.\nWhether on the facts and circumstances of the case,\nand in law, the Id. CIT(A) erred

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result appeals filed by the Revenue\nITA

ITA 1416/HYD/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Feb 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: CA MV Prasad AndFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 80I

801A(4) in terms of provision of section\n80AC, the Id CIT(A) has erred in law in giving her\nfinding that deduction not claimed in original return u/s\n139(1) cannot be denied if claimed pursuant to notice\nu/s 153A.\nii.\nWhether on the facts and circumstances of the case,\nand in law, the Id. CIT(A) erred

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

ITA 1721/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Feb 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: CA MV Prasad AndFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 801A(4)Section 80I

801A(4) in terms of provision of section\n80AC, the Id CIT(A) has erred in law in giving her\nfinding that deduction not claimed in original return u/s\n139(1) cannot be denied if claimed pursuant to notice\nu/s 153A.\nii.\nWhether on the facts and circumstances of the case,\nand in law, the Id. CIT(A) erred

NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 239/HYD/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Kumar Chakrapany, C.AFor Respondent: Smt.Mamata Choudhary
Section 115JSection 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

801A of the Act, of an amount being Rs. 30,60,57,963/-, under the facts and circumstances of the case. 10. The learned Authorities below ought to have considered the tax relief claimed by the Appellant, an amount being Rs. 12,22,825/-, under section 90/90A of the Act, under the fact and circumstances of the case

NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 240/HYD/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Dec 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Kumar Chakrapany, C.AFor Respondent: Smt.Mamata Choudhary
Section 115JSection 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

801A of the Act, of an amount being Rs. 30,60,57,963/-, under the facts and circumstances of the case. 10. The learned Authorities below ought to have considered the tax relief claimed by the Appellant, an amount being Rs. 12,22,825/-, under section 90/90A of the Act, under the fact and circumstances of the case

NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the three appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 241/HYD/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Dec 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Pawan Kumar Chakrapany, C.AFor Respondent: Smt.Mamata Choudhary
Section 115JSection 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80I

801A of the Act, of an amount being Rs. 30,60,57,963/-, under the facts and circumstances of the case. 10. The learned Authorities below ought to have considered the tax relief claimed by the Appellant, an amount being Rs. 12,22,825/-, under section 90/90A of the Act, under the fact and circumstances of the case

NEC-NCC-MAYTAS JV ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(1), HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 1129/HYD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 May 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzarl, (A.R.)For Respondent: Shri YVST Sai (CIT-D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 80I

section 80IA(4) deduction disallowance of Rs.2,85,67,175 as follows : ----Space left intentionally------- 432/Hyd/2016; 2137/Hyd/2017 & 496, 1129 to 1132/Hyd/2018 432/Hyd/2016; 2137/Hyd/2017 & 496, 1129 to 1132/Hyd/2018 432/Hyd/2016; 2137/Hyd/2017 & 496, 1129 to 1132/Hyd/2018 432/Hyd/2016; 2137/Hyd/2017 & 496, 1129 to 1132/Hyd/2018 The Oxford Dictionary gives the meaning for the word ‘execute’ as to carry out a work or an order. The work

NEC-NCC-MAYTAS JV,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 496/HYD/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 May 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzarl, (A.R.)For Respondent: Shri YVST Sai (CIT-D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 80I

section 80IA(4) deduction disallowance of Rs.2,85,67,175 as follows : ----Space left intentionally------- 432/Hyd/2016; 2137/Hyd/2017 & 496, 1129 to 1132/Hyd/2018 432/Hyd/2016; 2137/Hyd/2017 & 496, 1129 to 1132/Hyd/2018 432/Hyd/2016; 2137/Hyd/2017 & 496, 1129 to 1132/Hyd/2018 432/Hyd/2016; 2137/Hyd/2017 & 496, 1129 to 1132/Hyd/2018 The Oxford Dictionary gives the meaning for the word ‘execute’ as to carry out a work or an order. The work

NEC-NCC MAYTAS JOINT VENTURE, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRLCE-6(1), HYD, HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed

ITA 430/HYD/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad12 May 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Afzarl, (A.R.)For Respondent: Shri YVST Sai (CIT-D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 80I

section 80IA(4) deduction disallowance of Rs.2,85,67,175 as follows : ----Space left intentionally------- 432/Hyd/2016; 2137/Hyd/2017 & 496, 1129 to 1132/Hyd/2018 432/Hyd/2016; 2137/Hyd/2017 & 496, 1129 to 1132/Hyd/2018 432/Hyd/2016; 2137/Hyd/2017 & 496, 1129 to 1132/Hyd/2018 432/Hyd/2016; 2137/Hyd/2017 & 496, 1129 to 1132/Hyd/2018 The Oxford Dictionary gives the meaning for the word ‘execute’ as to carry out a work or an order. The work

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. INDU PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed therefore

ITA 186/HYD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Md.Afzal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80Section 80ASection 80I

section 80IA(4) deduction disallowance of Rs.2,85,67,175 as follows : ----Space left intentionally------- :- 29 -: ITA Nos.186, 187, 188 & 189/Hyd/2018 :- 30 -: ITA Nos.186, 187, 188 & 189/Hyd/2018 :- 31 -: ITA Nos.186, 187, 188 & 189/Hyd/2018 The Oxford Dictionary gives the meaning for the word ‘execute’ as to carry out a work or an order. The work carried out by the assessee clearly

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. INDU PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed therefore

ITA 188/HYD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Md.Afzal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80Section 80ASection 80I

section 80IA(4) deduction disallowance of Rs.2,85,67,175 as follows : ----Space left intentionally------- :- 29 -: ITA Nos.186, 187, 188 & 189/Hyd/2018 :- 30 -: ITA Nos.186, 187, 188 & 189/Hyd/2018 :- 31 -: ITA Nos.186, 187, 188 & 189/Hyd/2018 The Oxford Dictionary gives the meaning for the word ‘execute’ as to carry out a work or an order. The work carried out by the assessee clearly

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. INDU PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed therefore

ITA 189/HYD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Md.Afzal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80Section 80ASection 80I

section 80IA(4) deduction disallowance of Rs.2,85,67,175 as follows : ----Space left intentionally------- :- 29 -: ITA Nos.186, 187, 188 & 189/Hyd/2018 :- 30 -: ITA Nos.186, 187, 188 & 189/Hyd/2018 :- 31 -: ITA Nos.186, 187, 188 & 189/Hyd/2018 The Oxford Dictionary gives the meaning for the word ‘execute’ as to carry out a work or an order. The work carried out by the assessee clearly

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. INDU PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed therefore

ITA 187/HYD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Md.Afzal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80Section 80ASection 80I

section 80IA(4) deduction disallowance of Rs.2,85,67,175 as follows : ----Space left intentionally------- :- 29 -: ITA Nos.186, 187, 188 & 189/Hyd/2018 :- 30 -: ITA Nos.186, 187, 188 & 189/Hyd/2018 :- 31 -: ITA Nos.186, 187, 188 & 189/Hyd/2018 The Oxford Dictionary gives the meaning for the word ‘execute’ as to carry out a work or an order. The work carried out by the assessee clearly

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 761/HYD/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 153A

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 723/HYD/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 153A

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1328/HYD/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Feb 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 153A

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 762/HYD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 153A

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 13/HYD/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Feb 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 153A

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 12/HYD/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Feb 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri P Murali Mohan Rao, CAFor Respondent: : Shri B. Balakrishna, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 153A

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened