BRIJESH CHANDWANI,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE -6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee for the assessment year 2020-2021 is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.1527 & 1528/Hyd/2025 Assessment Years – 2016-2017 & 2020-2021 Brijesh Chandwani The Dcit, Circle-6(1), Vs. Hyderabad – 500 034 Hyderabad. Pan Adkpc1537H (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा /Assessee By: Ca Pawan Kumar Chakrapani राज" व "ारा /Revenue By: Sri Ranjan Agrawala, Sr. Ar

reassessment order is not valid and liable to be set aside. Having considered the rival submissions as well as relevant material on record, at the outset we note that the co-ordinate bench of this Tribunal in the case of Kanakala Ravindra Reddy Vs. ITO (supra) [As per Corrigendum dated 10th October, 2025 the correct citation is Kotha Kanthaiah, Karimnagar

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened

MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. MADHUCON PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments. Meaning thereby, in respect of completed/unabated assessments, no addition can be made by the AO in absence of any incriminating material found during the course of search under section 132 or requisition under section 132A of the Act, 1961. However, the completed/unabated assessments can be re-opened

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

56,24,216/- including the\nprofits derived from eligible projects for which the assessee\nhas entered into direct agreement with the Government or\nStatutory Body on the ground that assessee has not\nsatisfied the condition of entering into agreement with the\nGovernment or Statutory Body.\nITA.No.1723/Hyd./2017 – A.Y. 2015-2016 :\n2.3.\nFor the impugned assessment year also, the\nAssessing

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result appeals filed by the Revenue\nITA

56,24,216/- including the\nprofits derived from eligible projects for which the assessee\nhas entered into direct agreement with the Government or\nStatutory Body on the ground that assessee has not\nsatisfied the condition of entering into agreement with the\nGovernment or Statutory Body.\nITA.No.1723/Hyd./2017 – A.Y. 2015-2016 :\n2.3.\nFor the impugned assessment year also, the\nAssessing

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

56,24,216/- including the\nprofits derived from eligible projects for which the assessee\nhas entered into direct agreement with the Government or\nStatutory Body on the ground that assessee has not\nsatisfied the condition of entering into agreement with the\n12\nITA. Nos.1721, 1722 & 1723/Hyd./2017\nAnd ITA.No.1416/Hyd./2019\nGovernment or Statutory Body.\nITA.No.1723/Hyd./2017

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(2), HYDERBAD vs. SEW INFRASTUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

56,24,216/- including the\nprofits derived from eligible projects for which the assessee\nhas entered into direct agreement with the Government or\nStatutory Body on the ground that assessee has not\n\nsatisfied the condition of entering into agreement with the\nGovernment or Statutory Body.\n\nITA.No.1723/Hyd./2017 – A.Y. 2015-2016 :\n\n2.3.\nFor the impugned assessment year

MENZIES BOBBA GROUND HANDLING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED (NOW MERGED WITH MENZIES AVIATION BOBBA(BANGALORE)PRIVATE LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. DCIT CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

reassessment proceedings, even if one were to say that such enquiry was inadequate, the same cannot be a ground for proceedings under Section 263 of the Act. By placing reliance on the decisions reported in CIT v. Sunbeam Auto Ltd. [2011] 332 ITR 167 (Delhi HC), Spectra Shares and Scrips

C5 INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED,SECUNDERABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(3), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha, G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.332/Hyd/2023 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18) C5 Infra (P) Ltd Vs. Acit Secunderabad Central Circle 2(3) Pan:Aafcc2138K Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri K.C. Devdas, Ca Shri C. Maheshwar Reddy, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Shri Narender Kumar Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 02/07/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 25/07/2025 आदेश/Order Per Vijay Pal Raothis Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 10/03/2023 Of The Learned Cit (A)-12, Hyderabad, For The A.Y.2017-18. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

56,77,225/-. Thereafter, a search & seizure action u/s 132 of the Act was carried out in the case of the assessee on 07/01/2021. During the course of search proceedings, some excel sheets named working.xlsx, jmmr25.11.2016.xlsx containing the names and amounts written against them were found from the email of one Shri B. Veeranjaneyulu, Sr. Accountant, of the assessee company

KRISHNA MURTHY ELLA,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT-CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Manjunatha, G. & Shri K. Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.585/Hyd/2023 & Sa No.10/Hyd/2024 (Arising Out Of Ita No.585/Hyd/2023) (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15) Shri Krishna Murthy Ella Vs. Dy. C. I. T. Hyderabad Circle 1(2) Pan:Aacpe6389G Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri P Murali Mohan Rao, Ca राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Smt. Sheetal Sarin, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 18/07/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 14/08/2024 आदेश/Order

section 148 to 153 assess or reassess such income for such A.Y. Before initiating proceedings u/s 147 for re-assessment of any income, escapement of income should be proved and such escapement is based on fresh tangible material come to the possession of the Assessing Officer. In other Page

PRYSMIAN CAVI E SISTEMI SRL INDIA PROJECT OFFICE (FORMERLY PIRELLI CAVI SISTEMI S P A INDIA PROJECT OFFICE),HYDERABAD vs. DCIT,( INT TAXN)-2, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

56,193/- against brought\nforward losses of Rs.4,74,89,404/-. The return of income of the assessee was\nselected for scrutiny and the Learned Assessing Officer (“Ld. AO”) passed an\norder under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 961 (“the Act\") on\n29.03.2004, making total disallowances of Rs.3,15,87,481/- on account of\nbusiness expenditure

PRYSMIAN CAVI E SISTEMI S.R.L,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT (INT,TAXN)-2, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

56,193/- against brought\nforward losses of Rs.4,74,89,404/-. The return of income of the assessee was\nselected for scrutiny and the Learned Assessing Officer (“Ld. AO”) passed an\norder under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 961 (“the Act\") on\n29.03.2004, making total disallowances of Rs.3,15,87,481/- on account of\nbusiness expenditure

COUNTRY CLUB HOSPITALITY & HOLIDAYS LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

reassessment proceedings under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 32 Country Club Hospitality & Holidays Limited 25. The learned CIT-DR for the Revenue, on the other hand, submitted that, in the original assessment order passed under Section 143(3) dated 18.03.2014, the A.O. had disallowed Rs. 56

SIVA SANKARA REDDY TUNGA,HYDERABAD. vs. ITO., WARD - 14(1), HYDERABAD.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Us:

56,14,000/-. 6. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A) but without success. 7. The assessee, being aggrieved with the order of the CIT(A), has carried the matter in appeal before us. 8. Shri KA Sai Prasad, CA, the Learned Authorized Representative (for short, “Ld. AR”) for the assessee, at the threshold

VIJAYAWADA TOLLWAY PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is\nOrder pronounced in the Open Court on 6th February, 2026

reassessment was completed\nunder section 143(3) read with section 147 of the Act on\n05.12.2019, wherein expenditure of Rs.11,53,67,882/- was\ndisallowed by the Learned Assessing Officer (“Ld. AO”) and the\ntotal income of the assessee was assessed at Rs.12,78,56