BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “reassessment”+ Section 293clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi276Mumbai176Bangalore103Jaipur80Chennai75Kolkata46Raipur37Patna33Lucknow33Chandigarh18Jodhpur15Rajkot13Ahmedabad11Indore9Surat8Hyderabad8Visakhapatnam6Nagpur6Agra6Amritsar5Cochin4Pune4SC4Allahabad3Calcutta2Ranchi1Guwahati1Orissa1

Key Topics

Section 10(1)24Section 153C14Section 14A12Section 153A8Section 1486Section 1476Addition to Income6Section 143(3)4Section 142(1)4

ASRA AHMED ,HYDERABAD vs. ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in I

ITA 157/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / Ita No.156/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18)

For Respondent: Shri B.Bala Krishna, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 148Section 153ASection 153BSection 153CSection 48Section 56

293/-. 5. Aggrieved by the final assessment order, the assessee is in appeal before us. 6. The ld.Counsel for the assessee submitted that the final assessment order passed by the Ld.AO u/s 153C r.w.s.144C(13) dated 19.01.2024 is barred by limitation, because as per section 153B of the Act, when notice is issued u/s 153C on 30.03.2022, the time limit

Business Income4
Exemption4
Disallowance4

SYED AHMED ZEESHANUDDIN,HYDERABAD vs. ADIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2 , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in I

ITA 156/HYD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / Ita No.156/Hyd/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18)

For Respondent: Shri B.Bala Krishna, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 148Section 153ASection 153BSection 153CSection 48Section 56

293/-. 5. Aggrieved by the final assessment order, the assessee is in appeal before us. 6. The ld.Counsel for the assessee submitted that the final assessment order passed by the Ld.AO u/s 153C r.w.s.144C(13) dated 19.01.2024 is barred by limitation, because as per section 153B of the Act, when notice is issued u/s 153C on 30.03.2022, the time limit

JSW ENERGY (UTKAL) LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS IND BARATH ENERGY UTKAL LIMITED),HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 539/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

293 ITR 01 (SC) submitted that, if the provisions of section 263 of the Act have been invoked on the issue other than the issue dealt in the proceedings u/s.147 of the Act, then the limitation period for the purpose of section 263(2) of the Act will be taken from the date of completion of order u/s.143

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. JSW ENERGY (UTKAL) LIMITED, HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue in ITA No

ITA 36/HYD/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Joshi, C.AFor Respondent: : Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

293 ITR 01 (SC) submitted that, if the provisions of section 263 of the Act have been invoked on the issue other than the issue dealt in the proceedings u/s.147 of the Act, then the limitation period for the purpose of section 263(2) of the Act will be taken from the date of completion of order u/s.143

NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LIMITED,R.R.DIST. vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals under consideration are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 1457/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sriram SeshadriFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai
Section 10(1)Section 115JSection 14A

293 to 301 of the paper book filed by the assessee for A.Y 2013-14. As seen from the alleged agreements, the assessee pays compensation for land use and service charges to the farmers. Even from these agreements, it is clearly evident that it is the farmer who carries out all the agricultural operations and not the assessee. Therefore

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-16(1),, HYDERABAD vs. NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LIMITED, R.R. DIST, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals under consideration are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 1463/HYD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sriram SeshadriFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai
Section 10(1)Section 115JSection 14A

293 to 301 of the paper book filed by the assessee for A.Y 2013-14. As seen from the alleged agreements, the assessee pays compensation for land use and service charges to the farmers. Even from these agreements, it is clearly evident that it is the farmer who carries out all the agricultural operations and not the assessee. Therefore

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-16(1),, HYDERABAD vs. NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LIMITED, R.R. DIST, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals under consideration are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 1464/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sriram SeshadriFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai
Section 10(1)Section 115JSection 14A

293 to 301 of the paper book filed by the assessee for A.Y 2013-14. As seen from the alleged agreements, the assessee pays compensation for land use and service charges to the farmers. Even from these agreements, it is clearly evident that it is the farmer who carries out all the agricultural operations and not the assessee. Therefore

NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LIMITED,R.R.DIST. vs. DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-16(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals under consideration are treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 1456/HYD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad31 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Sriram SeshadriFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai
Section 10(1)Section 115JSection 14A

293 to 301 of the paper book filed by the assessee for A.Y 2013-14. As seen from the alleged agreements, the assessee pays compensation for land use and service charges to the farmers. Even from these agreements, it is clearly evident that it is the farmer who carries out all the agricultural operations and not the assessee. Therefore