DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes on the above terms

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumar

reassessment or re-computation, as envisaged in Section 132B(1)(i) of the Act. The Appellant in this regard three orders passed by Hon’ble ITAT Benches viz., (i) ACIT Vs. Narendra N. Thacker [(2016) 45 ITR Trib 188 (Kol)]; (ii) unreported judgement in ACIT Vs. Sajjan Singh and (iii) unreported order in Arun Bansal, Delhi Vs. ACIT, Delhi

LAXMI DHARAMSOTH,MANCHYA THANDA vs. ITO., WARD-1, WARANGAL

Bench: Us:

reassessment stating that the AO had reasons to believe that the income has escaped assessment. But on what reasons the learned AD has opted to re-open the assessment and the copy of the approval taken is not provided to the Appellant. 3. The Appellant has been under medical care since 2013 for the Chronic Kidney related alignments

DAYA SHANKER TIWARI, HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6(1), I T TOWER, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G

1), Hyderabad. PAN ABSPT0309E PIN-500 004. Telangana. (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : CA, K A Sai Prasad For Revenue : Shri Vinod Kannan, Sr. AR Date of Hearing : 05.08.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 08.08.2025 ORDER PER MANJUNATHA G. : The above appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 17.03.2025 of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax-(Appeals)-National Faceless