Search: reassessment | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

397 results for “reassessment”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,635 Delhi2,067 Chennai915 Bangalore824 Jaipur597 Kolkata483 Ahmedabad463 Hyderabad397 Pune311 Chandigarh252 Indore175 Cochin159 Visakhapatnam151 Surat143 Rajkot136 Raipur132 Cuttack121 Amritsar108 Karnataka95 Nagpur75 Lucknow64 Telangana60 Patna58 Guwahati49 Jodhpur49 Agra41 Dehradun30 SC29 Ranchi26 Allahabad25 Panaji11 Calcutta10 Jabalpur9 Kerala8 Rajasthan7 Orissa4 Varanasi4 Punjab & Haryana3 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2 K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1 Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 148101 Section 14788 Addition to Income85 Section 143(3)58 Section 153C46 Section 153A45 Section 13241 Disallowance32 Section 153B30 Section 148A

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. AMSRI BUILDERS , SECUNDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue for A

ITA 1897/HYD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Mar 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. Hon’Ble & Shri K. Narasimha Chary Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri K.C. Devdas, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. M. Narmada, CIT-DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 28

reassessment proceedings the assessee cannot claim deduction which was neither claimed nor allowed in original assessment and it is not open

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTURCTURE LTD,, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 397 · Page 1 of 20

...

30

Search & Seizure29

ITA 610/HYD/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Feb 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri K.C. DevdasFor Respondent: Shri YVST Sai

Section 153ASection 2Section 80Section 80ISection 80l

deductions cannot be made in reassessment proceedings. In the present case, the proceedings are in the nature of reassessment 8 I.T.A

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTURCTURES LIMITED, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1375/HYD/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Feb 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri K.C. DevdasFor Respondent: Shri YVST Sai

Section 153ASection 2Section 80Section 80ISection 80l

deductions cannot be made in reassessment proceedings. In the present case, the proceedings are in the nature of reassessment 8 I.T.A

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTURCTURE LTD,, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 608/HYD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Feb 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri K.C. DevdasFor Respondent: Shri YVST Sai

Section 153ASection 2Section 80Section 80ISection 80l

deductions cannot be made in reassessment proceedings. In the present case, the proceedings are in the nature of reassessment 8 I.T.A

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTURCTURE LIMITED, HYD, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1540/HYD/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Feb 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri K.C. DevdasFor Respondent: Shri YVST Sai

Section 153ASection 2Section 80Section 80ISection 80l

deductions cannot be made in reassessment proceedings. In the present case, the proceedings are in the nature of reassessment 8 I.T.A

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTURCTURE LTD,, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 609/HYD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Feb 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri K.C. DevdasFor Respondent: Shri YVST Sai

Section 153ASection 2Section 80Section 80ISection 80l

deductions cannot be made in reassessment proceedings. In the present case, the proceedings are in the nature of reassessment 8 I.T.A

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE-2(1), HYD, HYDERABAD vs. MEGHA ENGINEERING & INFRASTURCTURE LTD,, HYDERABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 607/HYD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Feb 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmans.No.

For Appellant: Shri K.C. DevdasFor Respondent: Shri YVST Sai

Section 153ASection 2Section 80Section 80ISection 80l

deductions cannot be made in reassessment proceedings. In the present case, the proceedings are in the nature of reassessment 8 I.T.A

YADIKI PACS,ANANTAPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, ANANTAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 926/HYD/2025[AY 2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad09 Jan 2026

Bench: the Andhra Pradesh High Court against the Order of the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad rejecting the appellant's application filed u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act to condone the delay in filing the Income Tax Return for the subject AY 2019-20 is pending for disposal as on date. 7. For that the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) had erred in confirming the levy of interest u/s 234A of the Act in consequence to the above." 3

Section 119(2)(b)Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 234ASection 80ASection 80P

deduction under Section 80P amounting to Rs. 1,08,08,087/-. 4 Yadiki PACS 4. During the course of reassessment

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. INDU PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed therefore

ITA 187/HYD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Md.Afzal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80Section 80ASection 80I

reassessment proceedings the assessee cannot claim deduction which was neither claimed nor allowed in original assessment and it is not open

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. INDU PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed therefore

ITA 188/HYD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Feb 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Md.Afzal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80Section 80ASection 80I

reassessment proceedings the assessee cannot claim deduction which was neither claimed nor allowed in original assessment and it is not open

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. INDU PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed therefore

ITA 189/HYD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Md.Afzal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80Section 80ASection 80I

reassessment proceedings the assessee cannot claim deduction which was neither claimed nor allowed in original assessment and it is not open

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. INDU PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

Appeals are dismissed therefore

ITA 186/HYD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri Md.Afzal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 80Section 80ASection 80I

reassessment proceedings the assessee cannot claim deduction which was neither claimed nor allowed in original assessment and it is not open

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

In the result appeals filed by the Revenue\nITA

ITA 1416/HYD/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

For Appellant: CA MV Prasad AndFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 80I

reassessment proceedings the assessee\ncannot claim deduction which was neither claimed nor\nallowed in original assessment and it is not open

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1722/HYD/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

For Appellant: CA MV Prasad AndFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 80I

reassessment proceedings the assessee\ncannot claim deduction which was neither claimed nor\nallowed in original assessment and it is not open

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), HYDERABAD vs. SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED , HYDERABAD

ITA 1721/HYD/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

For Appellant: CA MV Prasad AndFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 801A(4)Section 80I

reassessment proceedings the assessee\ncannot claim deduction which was neither claimed nor\nallowed in original assessment and it is not open

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(2), HYDERBAD vs. SEW INFRASTUCTURE LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1723/HYD/2017[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad26 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

For Appellant: CA MV Prasad AndFor Respondent: Shri B. Bala Krishna, CIT-DR

Section 132Section 153ASection 801A(4)Section 80I

reassessment proceedings the assessee\ncannot claim deduction which was neither claimed nor\nallowed in original assessment and it is not open

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD vs. AMSRI BUILDERS, SECUNDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue for A

ITA 1898/HYD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad13 Mar 2025AY 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri K.C. Devdas, C.AFor Respondent: Smt. M. Narmada, CIT-DR

Section 153ASection 28

reassessment proceedings the assessee cannot claim deduction\nwhich was neither claimed nor allowed in original assessment and it is\nnot

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. GKC PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1032/HYD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P.V.S.S.Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 80Section 80ASection 80A(5)Section 80I

reassessment proceedings the assessee cannot claim deduction which was neither claimed nor allowed in original assessment and it is not open

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. GKC PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1029/HYD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Feb 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P.V.S.S.Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 80Section 80ASection 80A(5)Section 80I

reassessment proceedings the assessee cannot claim deduction which was neither claimed nor allowed in original assessment and it is not open

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. GKC PROJECTS LIMITED, HYDERABAD

ITA 1030/HYD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad22 Feb 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri P.V.S.S.Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T.Sai, CIT-DR

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 153ASection 80Section 80ASection 80A(5)Section 80I

reassessment proceedings the assessee cannot claim deduction which was neither claimed nor allowed in original assessment and it is not open