Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur5 Kolkata4 Pune3 Visakhapatnam2 Indore2 Hyderabad1 Mumbai1 Cochin1 Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)6 Section 143(3)2 Section 92C2

F5 NETWORKS INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 912/HYD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Sharath Rao & ShriFor Respondent: Shri Narender Kumar Naik

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 92C

80D, etc.) exceeds the permissible limit. ITA No.912/Hyd/2024 18 5. Mismatch in Income & Form 26AS/TDS Details - Any inconsistency between the income reported and the details in Form 26AS, AIS, or TDS certificates may be adjusted. 6. Disallowance of Exempt Income - If any income claimed as exempt does not meet the required conditions. 7. Mismatch in Tax Payments - Adjustments for advance