Search: penalty u/s 271

5 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur40 Delhi37 Mumbai15 Visakhapatnam11 Amritsar10 Hyderabad5 Indore4 Ahmedabad4 Kolkata4 Lucknow4 Raipur3 Pune3 Nagpur2 Bangalore1 Allahabad1 Agra1 Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 1487 Section 271(1)(c)7 Section 139(1)6 Section 139(4)6 Section 80A6 Section 143(1)6 Addition to Income5 Deduction4 Section 147

RAVINDRA REDDY PALLAVALLI, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-8(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 763/HYD/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad28 Mar 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Smt. P. Madhavi Devishri Ravinder Reddy Vs Income Tax Officer Pallavali Ward 8(2) Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan: Amhpp 1849 B (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Smt. N. Swapna, DR

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 80C

80C of the Act. 3. In response to the show-cause notice, the assessee filed a letter dated 21.09.2011 stating that he is a small contractor and is executing small work and the amounts deposited in the Bank A/c are nothing but the money received from his family members who are agriculturists and also that he has given loans

RAVINDRA REDDY PALLAVALLI, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-8(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

RAVINDRA REDDY PALLAVALLI, HYD,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-8(2), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

ITO WARD-1, NELLORE vs. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY RASAM , NELLORE

ITO WARD-1,, NELLORE vs. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY RASAM, NELLORE

ITO WARD-1, NELLORE vs. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY RASAM, NELLORE

F5 NETWORKS INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD