BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 50Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai61Delhi55Ahmedabad26Jaipur20Surat10Lucknow10Agra9Dehradun7Hyderabad6Indore6Chennai6Visakhapatnam6Bangalore6Pune4Chandigarh4Kolkata3Nagpur3Rajkot3Jodhpur2Allahabad2Jabalpur1Raipur1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)14Section 26310Section 143(3)8Section 50C8Section 1475Section 1484Penalty4Section 115J3Addition to Income3

PARANJYOTHI THOTA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2050/HYD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos. 2050 & 2079/Hyd/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2012-13) Smt. Paran Jyothi Thota Vs. Asstt. Cit Hyderabad Circle 5(1) Pan:Ajqpt7772F Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee By: Advocate C. Anurag रधजस् व द्वधरध/Revenue By: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing: 12/02/2026 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Pronouncement: 25/02/2026 आदेश/Order Per Manjunatha, G. A.M. These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, Dated 09/09/2025 & 25/09/2025, For The Assessment Year 2012-13. Page 1 Of 33

For Appellant: Advocate C. AnuragFor Respondent: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C
Section 271(1)2
Cash Deposit2
Revision u/s 2632

50C of the Act. Further, as per the sale deed, the assessee is having a share of 1/4th of the property, as such the assessee’s share in the sale proceeds is 1/4th of the property which works out to Rs.8,87,500/-and the corresponding market value for the purpose of stamp duty is Rs.20

PARANJYOTHI THOTA,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2079/HYD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Feb 2026AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Manjunatha G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos. 2050 & 2079/Hyd/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year: 2012-13) Smt. Paran Jyothi Thota Vs. Asstt. Cit Hyderabad Circle 5(1) Pan:Ajqpt7772F Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) निर्धाररती द्वधरध/Assessee By: Advocate C. Anurag रधजस् व द्वधरध/Revenue By: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख/Date Of Hearing: 12/02/2026 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Pronouncement: 25/02/2026 आदेश/Order Per Manjunatha, G. A.M. These Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, Dated 09/09/2025 & 25/09/2025, For The Assessment Year 2012-13. Page 1 Of 33

For Appellant: Advocate C. AnuragFor Respondent: Dr. Sachin Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

50C of the Act. Further, as per the sale deed, the assessee is having a share of 1/4th of the property, as such the assessee’s share in the sale proceeds is 1/4th of the property which works out to Rs.8,87,500/-and the corresponding market value for the purpose of stamp duty is Rs.20

SURESH KUMAR BACHIRAJU,KUKATPALLY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-11(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 177/HYD/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar & Shri Manjunatha, G.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.177/Hyd/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Shri Suresh Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer Bachiraju, Ward 11(1) Kukatapally Hyderabad Pan:Afkpb6727Q (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Advocate Kiran Manohar राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Smt. Sheetal Sarin, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 16/04/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 16/04/2024

For Appellant: Advocate Kiran ManoharFor Respondent: : Smt. Sheetal Sarin, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271(1)(c)Section 274Section 50C

penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Rs.30,36,054/-. 6. The ld. CIT(A) ought to have considered the fact that the difference arose because of application of section 50C

SURESH KUMAR BACHIRAJU ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS ,WARD -11(5), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 496/HYD/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarआ.अपी.सं / Ita Nos.496 & 497/Hyd/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Suresh Kumar Bachiraju, The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Hyderabad. Ward – 11(5), Hyderabad. Pan : Afkpb6727Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Sri S. Rama Rao. Respondent By : Ms. Th Vijaya Lakshmi, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 05.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 17.07.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, Jm:

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Ms. TH Vijaya Lakshmi
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1) (c) of the I.T.Act.” 5. The brief facts of the case are that assessee is a real estate agent, filed his return of income on 07.12.2017 for A.Y. 2012-13 declaring total income at Rs.3,18,750/- under the head “Income from other sources’ and claiming short term capital loss of Rs.3

SURESH KUMAR BACHIRAJU ,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICERS ,WARD -11(5), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 497/HYD/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Jul 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarआ.अपी.सं / Ita Nos.496 & 497/Hyd/2021 (निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Suresh Kumar Bachiraju, The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Hyderabad. Ward – 11(5), Hyderabad. Pan : Afkpb6727Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Sri S. Rama Rao. Respondent By : Ms. Th Vijaya Lakshmi, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 05.07.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 17.07.2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, Jm:

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Ms. TH Vijaya Lakshmi
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263Section 271(1)Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

penalty proceedings u/s 271(1) (c) of the I.T.Act.” 5. The brief facts of the case are that assessee is a real estate agent, filed his return of income on 07.12.2017 for A.Y. 2012-13 declaring total income at Rs.3,18,750/- under the head “Income from other sources’ and claiming short term capital loss of Rs.3

NALAMATI SEA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO WARD-16(2), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 546/HYD/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad16 Jan 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri K. Narasimha Charyassessment Year: 2012-13 Nalamati Sea Foods (P) Ltd Vs. Income Tax Officer Hyderabad Ward 16(2) Pan: Aabcn1440K Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri E.S. Ranganath, Ca Revenue By: Shri Kumar Aditya, Dr Date Of Hearing: 16/01/2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 16/01/2023 Order Per R.K. Panda, A.M

For Appellant: Shri E.S. Ranganath, CAFor Respondent: Shri Kumar Aditya, DR
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act. We find the assessee did not appear before the CIT (A)-NFAC for which the learned CIT (A)-NFAC has confirmed the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer and dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee. We find the Tribunal in assessee’s own case in the quantum proceedings has deleted