Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi66 Mumbai59 Raipur40 Visakhapatnam13 Indore11 Bangalore11 Jaipur10 Ahmedabad8 Nagpur7 Lucknow4 Pune4 Hyderabad3 Panaji3 Chennai2 Dehradun1 Chandigarh1

Key Topics

Section 1477 Section 143(3)6 Section 143(1)6 Addition to Income3 Section 143(2)2 Section 1482 Section 43B2 Section 92C2 Disallowance2

F5 NETWORKS INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 912/HYD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Sharath Rao & ShriFor Respondent: Shri Narender Kumar Naik

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 92C

43B of the Act towards gratuity expenses, as the payment was made within the statutory time and is otherwise allowable. Hence the ground of appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed.” ITA No.912/Hyd/2024 22 9.2 We have also gone through the para nos.6 to 8 of the order of this Tribunal in the case of Mantri Cosmos II Owners Welfare

F5 NETWORKS INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD

AP RAJIV SWAGRUHA CORPORATION LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

F5 NETWORKS INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD

AP RAJIV SWAGRUHA CORPORATION LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-17(1), HYDERABAD vs. DRS LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED , SECUNDERABAD