Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 36(1)(VA)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai44 Delhi21 Jaipur17 Ahmedabad12 Indore11 Raipur10 Pune6 Chandigarh6 Kolkata3 Lucknow3 Rajkot3 Hyderabad2 Surat1 Bangalore1 Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)10 Section 270A7 Section 143(3)3 Section 143(1)(a)2 Section 362 Section 92C2 Disallowance2 Addition to Income2

F5 NETWORKS INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for

ITA 912/HYD/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad30 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

For Appellant: Shri Sharath Rao & ShriFor Respondent: Shri Narender Kumar Naik

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 92C

36(1)(va) of the Act. However, the said deposits were made prior to filing of return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act. 6.1 Of course, it is a case in point that the assessee did not file any appeal against the intimations passed us 143(1) of the Act and the Ld. Sr. DR is right

F5 NETWORKS INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD

BHEL LCC SOCIETY LTD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD

F5 NETWORKS INNOVATION PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(1), HYDERABAD

BHEL LCC SOCIETY LTD,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD