Search: penalty u/s 271

2 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 276C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai19 Delhi13 Pune11 Jaipur10 Kolkata7 Patna6 Indore2 SC2 Ahmedabad2 Ranchi2 Hyderabad2 Jodhpur1 Bangalore1 Chennai1 Agra1 Lucknow1 Rajkot1

Key Topics

Section 404 Section 270A3 Section 40A(3)2 Disallowance2 Addition to Income2 Condonation of Delay2

KAKINADA INFRASTRUCTURE HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD

ITA 1053/HYD/2025[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad21 Jan 2026AY 2021-2022

For Appellant: \nShri Naresh Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: MS Reema Yadav, Sr. AR

Section 270A

276C(1) r/w section 277 before the Economic\nOffences Court, Jaipur,\nOn receipt of such information, the assessee again\nconsulted with his local Counsel and another Counsel based in\nJaipur and it was advised by the Counsel based in Jaipur that the\nassessee should immediately file appeal before the Tribunal\nagainst the levy of penalty. We therefore find that

DEMI REALTORS,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6(1), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes on the above terms

ITA 156/HYD/2023[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad05 Feb 2024AY 2008-09